[GH-ISSUE #400] Should reviewdog commands remain in this repository? #8700

Open
opened 2026-05-31 05:27:03 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 0 comments
Owner

Originally created by @jessicalostinspace on GitHub (Apr 16, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/sdras/awesome-actions/issues/400

Originally assigned to: @gep13 on GitHub.

There are a lot of reviewdog references in actions committed to this repository. It seems like the reviewdog tool is itself an action library that can be used to implement certain commands that show up in your actions logs as well as options to add outputs in PR's. Should the reviewdog output actions to PR's be resolved into a single reference in this repository(awesome-actions) under this link: https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog? Any feedback here would be appreciated, as I have not taken a deep dive into that repository yet.

Originally created by @jessicalostinspace on GitHub (Apr 16, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/sdras/awesome-actions/issues/400 Originally assigned to: @gep13 on GitHub. There are a lot of reviewdog references in actions committed to this repository. It seems like the reviewdog tool is itself an action library that can be used to implement certain commands that show up in your actions logs as well as options to add outputs in PR's. Should the reviewdog output actions to PR's be resolved into a single reference in this repository(awesome-actions) under this link: https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog? Any feedback here would be appreciated, as I have not taken a deep dive into that repository yet.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-actions#8700