github-starred/awesome-actions
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sdras/awesome-actions.git synced 2026-07-17 12:02:24 -05:00
Code Issues 3.5k Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #303] Break up linting and testing into two separate groups, possibly a third - monitoring #8694

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-05-31 05:26:06 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-31 05:26:06 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jessicalostinspace on GitHub (Jan 18, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/sdras/awesome-actions/issues/303

Linting and Testing should be two separate groups with possible sub groups. For example: under linting, each language could be split into subgroups or a groupd like "reviewdog" which has several entries not grouped together under the linting category. Monitoring could also be separated out to its own group (ie. scanning code quality, code coverage, etc). "Scan git commits for secrets with gitleaks" and "Scan for secrets in your source code" should also be moved to "Security" group.

Originally created by @jessicalostinspace on GitHub (Jan 18, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/sdras/awesome-actions/issues/303 Linting and Testing should be two separate groups with possible sub groups. For example: under linting, each language could be split into subgroups or a groupd like "reviewdog" which has several entries not grouped together under the linting category. Monitoring could also be separated out to its own group (ie. scanning code quality, code coverage, etc). "Scan git commits for secrets with gitleaks" and "Scan for secrets in your source code" should also be moved to "Security" group.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-31 05:26:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@gep13 commented on GitHub (Jan 18, 2020):

@jessicalostinspace this makes a lot of sense to me. Would you be in a position to send in a PR to make these changes?

<!-- gh-comment-id:575903532 --> @gep13 commented on GitHub (Jan 18, 2020): @jessicalostinspace this makes a lot of sense to me. Would you be in a position to send in a PR to make these changes?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
enhancement
help wanted
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-actions#8694
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?