[PR #4022] [MERGED] [PM-13101] Validate FIDO2 privileged apps against community allow list #35119

Closed
opened 2026-04-21 02:34:37 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 0 comments
Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/bitwarden/android/pull/4022
Author: @SaintPatrck
Created: 10/3/2024
Status: Merged
Merged: 10/7/2024
Merged by: @SaintPatrck

Base: mainHead: PM-13101/check-comm-list


📝 Commits (2)

  • 5360577 [PM-13101] Validate FIDO2 privileged apps against community allow list
  • 6afbb04 Apply review suggestions

📊 Changes

3 files changed (+81 additions, -7 deletions)

View changed files

📝 app/src/main/assets/fido2_privileged_google.json (+0 -0)
📝 app/src/main/java/com/x8bit/bitwarden/data/autofill/fido2/manager/Fido2CredentialManagerImpl.kt (+44 -4)
📝 app/src/test/java/com/x8bit/bitwarden/data/autofill/fido2/manager/Fido2CredentialManagerTest.kt (+37 -3)

📄 Description

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-13101

📔 Objective

This commit introduces a two-step validation process for FIDO2
privileged applications.

First, the app is validated against the Google allow list. If the
validation fails, the app is then validated against the community
allow list.

This change ensures that apps can be validated against both lists,
improving the security and flexibility of the FIDO2 privileged app
validation process.

Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed
    issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/bitwarden/android/pull/4022 **Author:** [@SaintPatrck](https://github.com/SaintPatrck) **Created:** 10/3/2024 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 10/7/2024 **Merged by:** [@SaintPatrck](https://github.com/SaintPatrck) **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `PM-13101/check-comm-list` --- ### 📝 Commits (2) - [`5360577`](https://github.com/bitwarden/android/commit/5360577ad15408f1f442d172f49843c858b47a26) [PM-13101] Validate FIDO2 privileged apps against community allow list - [`6afbb04`](https://github.com/bitwarden/android/commit/6afbb044d7d468b716d27490d2d4885e6d284d88) Apply review suggestions ### 📊 Changes **3 files changed** (+81 additions, -7 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `app/src/main/assets/fido2_privileged_google.json` (+0 -0) 📝 `app/src/main/java/com/x8bit/bitwarden/data/autofill/fido2/manager/Fido2CredentialManagerImpl.kt` (+44 -4) 📝 `app/src/test/java/com/x8bit/bitwarden/data/autofill/fido2/manager/Fido2CredentialManagerTest.kt` (+37 -3) </details> ### 📄 Description ## 🎟️ Tracking https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-13101 ## 📔 Objective This commit introduces a two-step validation process for FIDO2 privileged applications. First, the app is validated against the Google allow list. If the validation fails, the app is then validated against the community allow list. This change ensures that apps can be validated against both lists, improving the security and flexibility of the FIDO2 privileged app validation process. ## ⏰ Reminders before review - Contributor guidelines followed - All formatters and local linters executed and passed - Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable - Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings - CI builds passed - Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements - Updated any necessary documentation or informed the documentation team ## 🦮 Reviewer guidelines <!-- Suggested interactions but feel free to use (or not) as you desire! --> - 👍 (`:+1:`) or similar for great changes - 📝 (`:memo:`) or ℹ️ (`:information_source:`) for notes or general info - ❓ (`:question:`) for questions - 🤔 (`:thinking:`) or 💭 (`:thought_balloon:`) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion - 🎨 (`:art:`) for suggestions / improvements - ❌ (`:x:`) or ⚠️ (`:warning:`) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention - 🌱 (`:seedling:`) or ♻️ (`:recycle:`) for future improvements or indications of technical debt - ⛏ (`:pick:`) for minor or nitpick changes --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
GiteaMirror added the pull-request label 2026-04-21 02:34:37 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/android#35119