github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-06-10 15:47:10 -05:00
Code Issues 2.7k Packages Projects Releases 58 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #6998] [Feature] Expense only accounts #92567

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-05-26 03:39:40 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-26 03:39:40 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @damianon on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6998

Verified feature request does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

💻

  • Would you like to implement this feature?

Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve?

Most accounts are automatically synced via gocardless. Additionally it would be nice to track expenses from other sources like accounts that are not in actual, cash, etc. These accounts shouldn't maintain a balance since the only purpose is to track expenses for the sake of budgets so needing to manually keep track of balances would be a hassle.

Describe your ideal solution to this problem

I think the only real change for this would need (open to suggestions and critique as well) would be to hide the balance of that account from the overview and the "All accounts" summary, assuming that doesn't interfer with the Budget screen.

Teaching and learning

When creating an account additionally to "Off budget" there could be a checkbox "Expenses only"

Originally created by @damianon on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6998 ### Verified feature request does not already exist? - [x] I have searched and found no existing issue ### 💻 - [x] Would you like to implement this feature? ### Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve? Most accounts are automatically synced via gocardless. Additionally it would be nice to track expenses from other sources like accounts that are not in actual, cash, etc. These accounts shouldn't maintain a balance since the only purpose is to track expenses for the sake of budgets so needing to manually keep track of balances would be a hassle. ### Describe your ideal solution to this problem I think the only real change for this would need (open to suggestions and critique as well) would be to hide the balance of that account from the overview and the "All accounts" summary, assuming that doesn't interfer with the Budget screen. ### Teaching and learning When creating an account additionally to "Off budget" there could be a checkbox "Expenses only"
GiteaMirror added the featureneeds votes labels 2026-05-26 03:39:40 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-26 03:39:43 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026):

✨ Thanks for sharing your idea! ✨

This repository uses a voting-based system for feature requests. While enhancement issues are automatically closed, we still welcome feature requests! The voting system helps us gauge community interest in potential features. We also encourage community contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help guide you toward a successful contribution).

The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+

Don't forget to upvote the top comment with 👍!

<!-- gh-comment-id:3910188284 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026): :sparkles: Thanks for sharing your idea! :sparkles: This repository uses a voting-based system for feature requests. While enhancement issues are automatically closed, we still welcome feature requests! The voting system helps us gauge community interest in potential features. We also encourage community contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help guide you toward a successful contribution). The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+ Don't forget to upvote the top comment with 👍! <!-- feature-auto-close-comment -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label feature needs votes
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#92567
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?