github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-07-10 23:54:00 -05:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 58 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #2561] [Feature] Ability to disable de-duplication logic for CSV/QFX/OFX imports #7967

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-10 18:06:53 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 18:06:53 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @MatissJanis on GitHub (Apr 6, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2561

Verified feature request does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

💻

  • Would you like to implement this feature?

Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve?

Sometimes the de-duplication logic gets in the way. This has been discussed in depth here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2420

Describe your ideal solution to this problem

We should add a checkbox option to the import modal. Checking this option would disable the de-duplication logic.

Teaching and learning

No response

Originally created by @MatissJanis on GitHub (Apr 6, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2561 ### Verified feature request does not already exist? - [X] I have searched and found no existing issue ### 💻 - [ ] Would you like to implement this feature? ### Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve? Sometimes the de-duplication logic gets in the way. This has been discussed in depth here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2420 ### Describe your ideal solution to this problem We should add a checkbox option to the import modal. Checking this option would disable the de-duplication logic. ### Teaching and learning _No response_
GiteaMirror added the feature label 2026-04-10 18:06:53 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 18:06:55 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2024):

✨ Thanks for sharing your idea! ✨

This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution).

The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+

Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍!

<!-- gh-comment-id:2041161203 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2024): :sparkles: Thanks for sharing your idea! :sparkles: This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution). The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+ Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍! <!-- feature-auto-close-comment -->
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 18:06:56 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2024):

I had been pondering this and I think this is the best way forward. The only other thing I was thinking was to change how de-dup handles reconciled transactions. Like reconciled transactions either have to match id's or be a perfect match.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2041162450 --> @youngcw commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2024): I had been pondering this and I think this is the best way forward. The only other thing I was thinking was to change how de-dup handles reconciled transactions. Like reconciled transactions either have to match id's or be a perfect match.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 18:06:57 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@keriati commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2024):

So if I understand it right, instead of using

packages/loot-core/src/server/accounts/sync.ts reconcileTransactions()

in case of imports we should be able to use

packages/loot-core/src/server/accounts/sync.ts addTransactions()
<!-- gh-comment-id:2041220133 --> @keriati commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2024): So if I understand it right, instead of using packages/loot-core/src/server/accounts/sync.ts reconcileTransactions() in case of imports we should be able to use packages/loot-core/src/server/accounts/sync.ts addTransactions()
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 18:06:57 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@strazto commented on GitHub (May 2, 2024):

Related to #2679

<!-- gh-comment-id:2089597097 --> @strazto commented on GitHub (May 2, 2024): Related to #2679
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
tech-support
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#7967
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?