github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-05 22:52:20 -05:00
Code Issues 1.5k Packages Projects Releases 54 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #1760] [Bug]: --color-pageTextLink on settings page hard to read in dark mode #7596

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-10 17:29:19 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 17:29:19 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @rich-howell on GitHub (Oct 5, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/1760

Verified issue does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

What happened?

When viewing Actual in Dark Mode as of 23.10.0 the --color-pageTextLink links are really difficult to read

image

Proposal is that these are made darker so that they are easier on the eye.

image

The above image also uses a strong weight.

What error did you receive?

None

Where are you hosting Actual?

Fly.io

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

Microsoft Edge

Operating System

Windows 11

Originally created by @rich-howell on GitHub (Oct 5, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/1760 ### Verified issue does not already exist? - [X] I have searched and found no existing issue ### What happened? When viewing Actual in Dark Mode as of 23.10.0 the --color-pageTextLink links are really difficult to read ![image](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/22135084/7197d7ce-f0b5-4d4c-9131-fc67985f3b90) Proposal is that these are made darker so that they are easier on the eye. ![image](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/22135084/21b391c3-77bf-4362-bc00-fd5c0000240d) The above image also uses a strong weight. ### What error did you receive? None ### Where are you hosting Actual? Fly.io ### What browsers are you seeing the problem on? Microsoft Edge ### Operating System Windows 11
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 17:29:21 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Evomatic commented on GitHub (Oct 5, 2023):

Hi @rich-howell I am interested in working on this issue, so I will take a look!

<!-- gh-comment-id:1748305277 --> @Evomatic commented on GitHub (Oct 5, 2023): Hi @rich-howell I am interested in working on this issue, so I will take a look!
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 17:29:21 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@paul-ooi commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2023):

@Evomatic , my suggestion on when considering "what is easier on the eyes" is look at using webAim's color checker (https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/). To ensure the foreground and background pairing pass (AA) for the size that this text is at. This way it's "easier on the eyes" for more people.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1773801417 --> @paul-ooi commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2023): @Evomatic , my suggestion on when considering "what is easier on the eyes" is look at using webAim's color checker (https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/). To ensure the foreground and background pairing pass (AA) for the size that this text is at. This way it's "easier on the eyes" for more people.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 17:29:22 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Evomatic commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2023):

@Evomatic , my suggestion on when considering "what is easier on the eyes" is look at using webAim's color checker (https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/). To ensure the foreground and background pairing pass (AA) for the size that this text is at. This way it's "easier on the eyes" for more people.

Hi @paul-ooi Thank you for sharing, I will take a look!

<!-- gh-comment-id:1774044464 --> @Evomatic commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2023): > @Evomatic , my suggestion on when considering "what is easier on the eyes" is look at using webAim's color checker (https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/). To ensure the foreground and background pairing pass (AA) for the size that this text is at. This way it's "easier on the eyes" for more people. Hi @paul-ooi Thank you for sharing, I will take a look!
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 17:29:23 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2023):

closing this as fixed with the updated colors.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1817597053 --> @youngcw commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2023): closing this as fixed with the updated colors.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label bug experimental feature feedback good first issue user interface
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#7596
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?