github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-05 22:52:20 -05:00
Code Issues 1.5k Packages Projects Releases 54 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #1574] [Bug]: Split transaction deposits parent transaction amount to off-budget account instead of the child transaction amount #7527

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-10 17:23:55 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 17:23:55 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @joel-jeremy on GitHub (Aug 23, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/1574

Verified issue does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

What happened?

When splitting a transaction between an off-budget account and another payee, the whole transaction amount (100) is being deposited to the off-budget account instead of the the child amount (50):

image
image

What error did you receive?

No response

Where are you hosting Actual?

Fly.io

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

Chrome

Operating System

Windows 11

Originally created by @joel-jeremy on GitHub (Aug 23, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/1574 ### Verified issue does not already exist? - [X] I have searched and found no existing issue ### What happened? When splitting a transaction between an off-budget account and another payee, the whole transaction amount (100) is being deposited to the off-budget account instead of the the child amount (50): ![image](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/20313680/7a9c91e0-a836-46c4-9115-1c0f2cb91403) ![image](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/20313680/90733dc8-4f57-4065-a6ec-4994c0b42e71) ### What error did you receive? _No response_ ### Where are you hosting Actual? Fly.io ### What browsers are you seeing the problem on? Chrome ### Operating System Windows 11
GiteaMirror added the split transactionsbug labels 2026-04-10 17:23:55 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 17:23:57 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kyrias commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2023):

More specifically, the problem here is that the creation of inverse transactions for transfers do not take split transactions into account.

To fix this properly I think what needs to be done is not create inverse transactions where is_parent is true, and instead create them for the related child transactions.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1690101857 --> @kyrias commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2023): More specifically, the problem here is that the creation of inverse transactions for transfers do not take split transactions into account. To fix this properly I think what needs to be done is _not_ create inverse transactions where `is_parent` is true, and instead create them for the related child transactions.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label bug split transactions
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#7527
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?