[GH-ISSUE #6586] Bot incorrectly generates release notes comments and commits for docs-only PRs #72523

Closed
opened 2026-05-16 12:41:22 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @coderabbitai[bot] on GitHub (Jan 6, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6586

Originally assigned to: @MatissJanis, @Copilot on GitHub.

Issue Description

The bot is currently requesting generating release notes for documentation-only pull requests. According to project guidelines, docs-only PRs should not require auto-generate release notes.

Context

This issue was identified in PR #6585 (https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/6585), which only modifies documentation files.

Expected Behavior

The bot should skip the release notes requirement for PRs that only modify documentation files.

Reported By

@MatissJanis

References

Originally created by @coderabbitai[bot] on GitHub (Jan 6, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6586 Originally assigned to: @MatissJanis, @Copilot on GitHub. ## Issue Description The bot is currently ~requesting~ generating release notes for documentation-only pull requests. According to project guidelines, docs-only PRs should not ~require~ auto-generate release notes. ## Context This issue was identified in PR #6585 (https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/6585), which only modifies documentation files. ## Expected Behavior The bot should skip the release notes requirement for PRs that only modify documentation files. ## Reported By @MatissJanis ## References - PR: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/6585 - Comment: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/6585#issuecomment
GiteaMirror added the tech debt label 2026-05-16 12:41:22 -05:00
Author
Owner

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2026):

Yeah this won't be simple.. the investment vs reward ratio here makes me think it's just not worth doing this. So closing.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3807323988 --> @MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2026): Yeah this won't be simple.. the investment vs reward ratio here makes me think it's just not worth doing this. So closing.
Author
Owner

@StephenBrown2 commented on GitHub (Jan 29, 2026):

Would cancelling the job be sufficient? i.e.

      - name: Check if PR is docs-only
        id: check-docs-only
        ...logic here

      - name: Cancel if requirements not met
        if: steps.check-base-branch.outputs.targets_master == 'false' || steps.check-docs-only.outputs.is_docs_only == 'true'
        run: |
          gh run cancel ${{ github.run_id }}
          gh run watch ${{ github.run_id }}
        env:
          GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

(From https://stackoverflow.com/a/75809743)

<!-- gh-comment-id:3818829624 --> @StephenBrown2 commented on GitHub (Jan 29, 2026): Would cancelling the job be sufficient? i.e. ```yaml - name: Check if PR is docs-only id: check-docs-only ...logic here - name: Cancel if requirements not met if: steps.check-base-branch.outputs.targets_master == 'false' || steps.check-docs-only.outputs.is_docs_only == 'true' run: | gh run cancel ${{ github.run_id }} gh run watch ${{ github.run_id }} env: GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} ``` (From https://stackoverflow.com/a/75809743)
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#72523