github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-06 15:12:35 -05:00
Code Issues 1.5k Packages Projects Releases 54 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #493] [Feature] Wildcard on payee #7105

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-10 16:46:35 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 16:46:35 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @rich-howell on GitHub (Jan 22, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/493

Discussed in https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/discussions/445

Originally posted by freefrank January 12, 2023
Like options on note, need to filter out payee for rules.
In my case, there are payees like
Online Banking Transfer - 9533 which 9533 is the transaction number, and I have alot of these transaction which should be classified into the same category.

Originally created by @rich-howell on GitHub (Jan 22, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/493 ### Discussed in https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/discussions/445 <div type='discussions-op-text'> <sup>Originally posted by **freefrank** January 12, 2023</sup> Like options on note, need to filter out payee for rules. In my case, there are payees like `Online Banking Transfer - 9533` which 9533 is the transaction number, and I have alot of these transaction which should be classified into the same category.</div>
GiteaMirror added the feature label 2026-04-10 16:46:35 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 16:46:37 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@j-f1 commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2023):

This is somewhat covered by “Contains” but there is definitely room for improvement!

<!-- gh-comment-id:1399509273 --> @j-f1 commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2023): This is somewhat covered by “Contains” but there is definitely room for improvement!
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-10 16:46:38 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jan 29, 2023):

Given the defined problem is already solvable by the usage of "contains" - I'll close this feature request.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1407751145 --> @MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jan 29, 2023): Given the defined problem is already solvable by the usage of "contains" - I'll close this feature request.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#7105
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?