mirror of
https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git
synced 2026-03-09 11:42:54 -05:00
Setup DockerHub organization #63
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/actual#63
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @boushley on GitHub (Apr 30, 2022).
Originally assigned to: @trevdor on GitHub.
Docker supports open source projects for free on DockerHub. We should look at setting that up so we can have an officially supported docker container. Once we've got that I can setup a GitHub Action that automatically publishes the container when changes are merged to
masteron this repo.I can go through the application process if that's helpful, but I didn't want to end up with maintainer access to it if that would cause concerns.
https://www.docker.com/community/open-source/application/
@afeedhshaji commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2022):
Yes, we need an official docker container!
@boushley commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2022):
There's a PR where someone's adding a docker-compose based on someone's image: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/11
@boushley commented on GitHub (May 1, 2022):
I went ahead and filled out the application to try and get
actualbudgetas an org on GitHub.@Kovah commented on GitHub (May 1, 2022):
This is related to actualbudget/actual-server#11, let me know when an org and project are set up so I can set the correct image name.
@genebean commented on GitHub (May 5, 2022):
Maybe consider also publishing to GitHub packages for free so people can avoid DockerHub’s pull limits and the like. https://github.com/features/packages
@hofq commented on GitHub (May 11, 2022):
You can Build it with Github Actions and Push it to Docker Hub, Github Packages etc.
https://github.com/hofq/actual-server-docker/blob/master/.github/workflows/docker-image.yml
@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2023):
👋 Sorry for the long time of inactivity folks!
We're currently looking to do this.
cc @trevdor
@trevdor commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2023):
Ah! Thanks for the tag. @boushley I'm sorry this was left unaddressed so long. It's definitely the direction we'd like to go, so thanks for the suggestion and the offer to apply. I certainly didn't mean to cut you out, I just didn't see this issue...but:
I submitted the application with Docker last week. Supposed to hear back within 30 days.
I'll keep this issue updated with any news until we have a resolution.
@trevdor commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2023):
Un-exciting update: no news yet from Docker (our application went in Jan 14th)
@Flightkick commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2023):
Does the transition to a dedicated Docker Hub org deprecate the current
jlongster/actual-serverimages?If so, it may be nice to inform current users to migrate.
@rich-howell commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2023):
If it does it will be fully comunicated :)
@trevdor commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2023):
Another non-update, but I don't want folks to think this was forgotten again: no update from Docker yet on our application
@trevdor commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2023):
Still nothing. Emailed Docker today for an update on the status of our application.
@trevdor commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2023):
We've been accepted. 🥳
Docker says we'll have an official Open Source org in the next couple weeks.
Of COURSE they email the same day as the big Docker Hub Open Source kerfuffle goes down. 🙄
My personal gut feel is Docker Hub is still the standard and we already use it, so we ought to start out there.
We'll just need to be careful in the future if anyone monetizes Actual.
We already have GHCR as a backup plan, but it seems sensible to plant our flag on Docker Hub as long as this fits our project's structure and needs.
Let's keep this issue open till we actually get the org set up.