github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-06 15:12:35 -05:00
Code Issues 1.5k Packages Projects Releases 54 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #7006] [Feedback]: Age of Money Report #52065

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-04-30 20:14:02 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-30 20:14:02 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @youngcw on GitHub (Feb 17, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/7006

Add all discussion and feedback for the experimental Age of Money Report here.
Original PR #6685.

Originally created by @youngcw on GitHub (Feb 17, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/7006 Add all discussion and feedback for the experimental Age of Money Report here. Original PR #6685.
GiteaMirror added the feedbackexperimental feature labels 2026-04-30 20:14:04 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-30 20:14:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@matt-fidd commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2026):

@sztomi I didn't catch that this wasn't the feedback issue linked in the experimental section before it was merged. Would you be able to put up another PR to change it to this issue please?

<!-- gh-comment-id:4200177406 --> @matt-fidd commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2026): @sztomi I didn't catch that this wasn't the feedback issue linked in the experimental section before it was merged. Would you be able to put up another PR to change it to this issue please?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-30 20:14:09 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@sztomi commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2026):

@matt-fidd Aah I forgot that. Of course.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4205197515 --> @sztomi commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2026): @matt-fidd Aah I forgot that. Of course.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-30 20:14:09 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@emiltb commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2026):

I tried this out and really like the metric - it seems like a good parameter to put a number on the health of your situation, without depending on absolute numbers in accounts.

Would it be an idea, to implement a slightly more sophisticated approach for the Improving/Declining/Stable metric? I looked at the current calculateTrend() function and I can see that it only looks at the last two datapoints. It might provide more insight to fit a line to the last N points and determine the trend based on the slope of such a line. Viewing daily data like the figure below, the end of april was reported stable until the last tick, but it is part of a more general upwards trend. I'm unsure about the best value of N, and it might have to be slightly different for daily/weekly/monthly.

Image
<!-- gh-comment-id:4326263781 --> @emiltb commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2026): I tried this out and really like the metric - it seems like a good parameter to put a number on the health of your situation, without depending on absolute numbers in accounts. Would it be an idea, to implement a slightly more sophisticated approach for the Improving/Declining/Stable metric? I looked at the current `calculateTrend()` function and I can see that it only looks at the last two datapoints. It might provide more insight to fit a line to the last N points and determine the trend based on the slope of such a line. Viewing daily data like the figure below, the end of april was reported stable until the last tick, but it is part of a more general upwards trend. I'm unsure about the best value of N, and it might have to be slightly different for daily/weekly/monthly. <img width="414" height="345" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/01dc7a39-65c4-42e4-b81c-0d79d0e2231a" />
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label experimental feature feedback
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#52065
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?