github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-06 15:12:35 -05:00
Code Issues 1.5k Packages Projects Releases 54 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #6959] [Bug]: Balance calculation for rule application making schedule preview transactions slow #52048

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-04-30 20:12:20 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-30 20:12:20 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @matt-fidd on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6959

What happened?

I found that while debugging an extremely large budget file, preview transactions were taking a long time to load (~5s after the transactions loaded). Looks like this is because rules are run on each transaction (side note, our current rule application method is poorly optimised for running rules on large transaction sets), and for each transaction, the account balance is calculated for use in rule formulae or rule action templating.

We should really find a way around this, balance calculation is expensive, especially in large accounts (these were all >3000 transactions), and if it's removed from the rules application, the TTL comes down from ~5s to >100ms.

Not sure how to label this, so it's a bug until someone disagrees :)

How can we reproduce the issue?

x

Where are you hosting Actual?

None

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

No response

Operating System

None

Originally created by @matt-fidd on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6959 ### What happened? I found that while debugging an extremely large budget file, preview transactions were taking a long time to load (~5s after the transactions loaded). Looks like this is because rules are run on each transaction (side note, our current rule application method is poorly optimised for running rules on large transaction sets), and for each transaction, the account balance is calculated for use in rule formulae or rule action templating. We should really find a way around this, balance calculation is expensive, especially in large accounts (these were all >3000 transactions), and if it's removed from the rules application, the TTL comes down from ~5s to >100ms. Not sure how to label this, so it's a bug until someone disagrees :) ### How can we reproduce the issue? x ### Where are you hosting Actual? None ### What browsers are you seeing the problem on? _No response_ ### Operating System None
GiteaMirror added the tech debtbug labels 2026-04-30 20:12:23 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-30 20:12:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@totallynotjon commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026):

Out of curiosity, is there an example large file that can be used to reproduce this? Seems like a fun one

<!-- gh-comment-id:3894810881 --> @totallynotjon commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026): Out of curiosity, is there an example large file that can be used to reproduce this? Seems like a fun one
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-30 20:12:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@matt-fidd commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026):

This one should work. The problem is completely gone if you just skip balance calculations, although that's obviously not what we'd want. Maybe it could be smarter about it and only calculate the balance if the rules for that transaction required it to?

Caching account balance is no good, because it can change from one transaction to the next (whether preview transactions balance calculation respect previous preview balance changes is probably another topic...)

largeBudget.zip

<!-- gh-comment-id:3894881960 --> @matt-fidd commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026): This one should work. The problem is completely gone if you just skip balance calculations, although that's obviously not what we'd want. Maybe it could be smarter about it and only calculate the balance if the rules for that transaction required it to? Caching account balance is no good, because it can change from one transaction to the next (whether preview transactions balance calculation respect previous preview balance changes is probably another topic...) [largeBudget.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25280774/largeBudget.zip)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label bug tech debt
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#52048
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?