github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-06 20:15:33 -05:00
Code Issues 1.5k Packages Projects Releases 55 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #2879] [Bug]: Rollover overspending indicators pushed off screen in mobile view #42807

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-26 02:54:47 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 7 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:54:47 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @matt-fidd on GitHub (Jun 13, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2879

Verified issue does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

What happened?

As above, image below.

image

Originally created by @matt-fidd on GitHub (Jun 13, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2879 ### Verified issue does not already exist? - [X] I have searched and found no existing issue ### What happened? As above, image below. ![image](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/81489167/30e59f28-f63e-415f-b607-d0f0512a76af)
GiteaMirror added the user interfacegood first issuebug labels 2026-04-26 02:54:47 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:54:49 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dymanoid commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2024):

Will be happy to work on this. Please also see my comment in #2774.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2176879585 --> @dymanoid commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2024): Will be happy to work on this. Please also see my comment in #2774.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:54:49 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 24, 2024):

I think that the a better solution would be to somehow integrate the arrow into the pill around the value. Maybe the pill should run up against the side of the screen and then the arrow can be inside the pill along with the amount

<!-- gh-comment-id:2186815932 --> @youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 24, 2024): I think that the a better solution would be to somehow integrate the arrow into the pill around the value. Maybe the pill should run up against the side of the screen and then the arrow can be inside the pill along with the amount
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:54:49 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dymanoid commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024):

Here are three possible solutions. Which one do you prefer?
I don't like the 3rd one where the dark value containers extend to the right to cover the carryover arrow.
I personally prefer the 1st one where the arrows are outside of the value containers, so basically the current design. But the 2nd one is also okay.
So what are your thoughts?
Variant 1:
a1

Variant 2:
a2

Variant 3:
a3

<!-- gh-comment-id:2189359479 --> @dymanoid commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024): Here are three possible solutions. Which one do you prefer? I don't like the 3rd one where the dark value containers extend to the right to cover the carryover arrow. I personally prefer the 1st one where the arrows are outside of the value containers, so basically the current design. But the 2nd one is also okay. So what are your thoughts? **Variant 1:** ![a1](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/9433345/58848dd6-090a-4f73-a286-9ea356da247e) **Variant 2:** ![a2](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/9433345/5cad212e-5b14-4a66-a6c1-d5f1f8eb0a79) **Variant 3:** ![a3](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/9433345/78503c8a-42b0-43a1-a5cf-e96764a5cd5c)
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:54:50 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024):

@dymanoid
option 1 would match desktop the most and is the most similar to existing. I wouldn't be against option 2 though if others liked that more.

With option 3 could the pill be squared against the side? So no rounded right side.
that might make it feel less inconsistent.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2189384113 --> @youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024): @dymanoid option 1 would match desktop the most and is the most similar to existing. I wouldn't be against option 2 though if others liked that more. With option 3 could the pill be squared against the side? So no rounded right side. that might make it feel less inconsistent.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:54:51 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dymanoid commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024):

Something like this?

image

<!-- gh-comment-id:2189461461 --> @dymanoid commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024): Something like this? ![image](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/9433345/288c35c4-ea42-4a3b-ac1a-08ff2ba2656a)
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:54:51 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024):

@dymanoid Yeah that was what I was thinking. It still seems a bit weird, but its an option. My hope is that we don't have to lose more space just to make it look good if possible. That extended pill could maybe do that and maybe different enough from the regular pill to not look wrong or missaligned

<!-- gh-comment-id:2189468032 --> @youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024): @dymanoid Yeah that was what I was thinking. It still seems a bit weird, but its an option. My hope is that we don't have to lose more space just to make it look good if possible. That extended pill could maybe do that and maybe different enough from the regular pill to not look wrong or missaligned
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:54:52 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dymanoid commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2024):

After discussing on Discord, this what we decided to implement:
image

<!-- gh-comment-id:2191950790 --> @dymanoid commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2024): After discussing on Discord, this what we decided to implement: ![image](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/assets/9433345/781358b5-3900-4f41-a09f-59d3d1c1329b)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label bug good first issue user interface
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#42807
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?