github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-05 22:52:20 -05:00
Code Issues 1.5k Packages Projects Releases 54 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #2301] [Bug]: yarn/node/vite issue starting up development container #42559

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-26 02:30:52 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:30:52 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jaarasys-henria on GitHub (Jan 29, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2301

Verified issue does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

Is this related to GoCardless, Simplefin or another bank-sync provider?

  • I have checked my server logs and could not see any errors there
  • I will be attaching my server logs to this issue
  • I will be attaching my client-side (browser) logs to this issue
  • I understand that this issue will be automatically closed if insufficient information is provided

What happened?

I meant to continue work on PR #1994, but stumbled upon an issue with the Docker-based development setup.

Using the provided docker-compose.yml I used to be able to spin up a development server without issues by just running docker compose up --build. With current master branch @ commit 43ebe9e0 there's an error spinning up the container, which I believe originates from yarn attempting to run vite.

Docker version 25.0.1, build 29cf629

Any help would be much appreciated.

What error did you receive?

docker compose up --build
[+] Building 0.0s (7/7) FINISHED                                                                                                                           docker:default
 => [actual-development internal] load build definition from Dockerfile                                                                                              0.0s
 => => transferring dockerfile: 457B                                                                                                                                 0.0s
 => [actual-development internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/node:18-bullseye                                                                               0.0s
 => [actual-development internal] load .dockerignore                                                                                                                 0.0s
 => => transferring context: 2B                                                                                                                                      0.0s
 => [actual-development 1/3] FROM docker.io/library/node:18-bullseye                                                                                                 0.0s
 => CACHED [actual-development 2/3] RUN apt-get update -y && apt-get upgrade -y && apt-get install -y openssl                                                        0.0s
 => CACHED [actual-development 3/3] WORKDIR /app                                                                                                                     0.0s
 => [actual-development] exporting to image                                                                                                                          0.0s
 => => exporting layers                                                                                                                                              0.0s
 => => writing image sha256:1f3fbe74fddbfb193352ac95bc2d2eaf971c822400126ffd5dd0b0174886a440                                                                         0.0s
 => => naming to docker.io/library/actual-development                                                                                                                0.0s
[+] Running 1/0
 ✔ Container actual-actual-development-1  Created                                                                                                                    0.0s 
Attaching to actual-development-1
actual-development-1  | Usage Error: Couldn't find a script named "webpack".
actual-development-1  | 
actual-development-1  | $ yarn run [--inspect] [--inspect-brk] [-T,--top-level] [-B,--binaries-only] [--require #0] <scriptName> ...
actual-development-1  | node:events:495
actual-development-1  |       throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
actual-development-1  |       ^
actual-development-1  | 
actual-development-1  | Error: spawn vite ENOENT
actual-development-1  |     at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:284:19)
actual-development-1  |     at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:477:16)
actual-development-1  |     at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21)
actual-development-1  | Emitted 'error' event on ChildProcess instance at:
actual-development-1  |     at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:290:12)
actual-development-1  |     at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:477:16)
actual-development-1  |     at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21) {
actual-development-1  |   errno: -2,
actual-development-1  |   code: 'ENOENT',
actual-development-1  |   syscall: 'spawn vite',
actual-development-1  |   path: 'vite',
actual-development-1  |   spawnargs: []
actual-development-1  | }
actual-development-1  | 
actual-development-1  | Node.js v18.18.2
actual-development-1  | ERROR: "start:browser-backend" exited with 1.
actual-development-1 exited with code 1+

Where are you hosting Actual?

Docker

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

No response

Operating System

Linux

Originally created by @jaarasys-henria on GitHub (Jan 29, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2301 ### Verified issue does not already exist? - [X] I have searched and found no existing issue ### Is this related to GoCardless, Simplefin or another bank-sync provider? - [ ] I have checked my server logs and could not see any errors there - [x] I will be attaching my server logs to this issue - [ ] I will be attaching my client-side (browser) logs to this issue - [x] I understand that this issue will be automatically closed if insufficient information is provided ### What happened? I meant to continue work on PR #1994, but stumbled upon an issue with the Docker-based development setup. Using the provided `docker-compose.yml` I used to be able to spin up a development server without issues by just running `docker compose up --build`. With current master branch @ commit 43ebe9e0 there's an error spinning up the container, which I believe originates from `yarn` attempting to run `vite`. ``` Docker version 25.0.1, build 29cf629 ``` Any help would be much appreciated. ### What error did you receive? ``` docker compose up --build [+] Building 0.0s (7/7) FINISHED docker:default => [actual-development internal] load build definition from Dockerfile 0.0s => => transferring dockerfile: 457B 0.0s => [actual-development internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/node:18-bullseye 0.0s => [actual-development internal] load .dockerignore 0.0s => => transferring context: 2B 0.0s => [actual-development 1/3] FROM docker.io/library/node:18-bullseye 0.0s => CACHED [actual-development 2/3] RUN apt-get update -y && apt-get upgrade -y && apt-get install -y openssl 0.0s => CACHED [actual-development 3/3] WORKDIR /app 0.0s => [actual-development] exporting to image 0.0s => => exporting layers 0.0s => => writing image sha256:1f3fbe74fddbfb193352ac95bc2d2eaf971c822400126ffd5dd0b0174886a440 0.0s => => naming to docker.io/library/actual-development 0.0s [+] Running 1/0 ✔ Container actual-actual-development-1 Created 0.0s Attaching to actual-development-1 actual-development-1 | Usage Error: Couldn't find a script named "webpack". actual-development-1 | actual-development-1 | $ yarn run [--inspect] [--inspect-brk] [-T,--top-level] [-B,--binaries-only] [--require #0] <scriptName> ... actual-development-1 | node:events:495 actual-development-1 | throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event actual-development-1 | ^ actual-development-1 | actual-development-1 | Error: spawn vite ENOENT actual-development-1 | at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:284:19) actual-development-1 | at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:477:16) actual-development-1 | at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21) actual-development-1 | Emitted 'error' event on ChildProcess instance at: actual-development-1 | at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:290:12) actual-development-1 | at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:477:16) actual-development-1 | at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21) { actual-development-1 | errno: -2, actual-development-1 | code: 'ENOENT', actual-development-1 | syscall: 'spawn vite', actual-development-1 | path: 'vite', actual-development-1 | spawnargs: [] actual-development-1 | } actual-development-1 | actual-development-1 | Node.js v18.18.2 actual-development-1 | ERROR: "start:browser-backend" exited with 1. actual-development-1 exited with code 1+ ``` ### Where are you hosting Actual? Docker ### What browsers are you seeing the problem on? _No response_ ### Operating System Linux
GiteaMirror added the bug label 2026-04-26 02:30:52 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:30:55 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jaarasys-henria commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2024):

This behavior is introduced by d5359a96. Prior commit 3eee0b11 works as before.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1917575015 --> @jaarasys-henria commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2024): This behavior is introduced by d5359a96. Prior commit 3eee0b11 works as before.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:30:55 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@twk3 commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2024):

@jaarasys-henria thanks for calling out this workflow. There is a bug here. Fixed by https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/2304

But from your error you also need to remove your node_modules directory to get the new dependencies. The current docker dev scripts for actual only install the dependencies once, when it sees that directory as empty. So to get ANY new dependencies you currently need to remove that directory to get the dependency install to happen again.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1917583521 --> @twk3 commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2024): @jaarasys-henria thanks for calling out this workflow. There is a bug here. Fixed by https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/2304 But from your error you also need to remove your `node_modules` directory to get the new dependencies. The current docker dev scripts for actual only install the dependencies once, when it sees that directory as empty. So to get ANY new dependencies you currently need to remove that directory to get the dependency install to happen again.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-26 02:30:56 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jaarasys-henria commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2024):

@jaarasys-henria thanks for calling out this workflow. There is a bug here. Fixed by #2304

But from your error you also need to remove your node_modules directory to get the new dependencies. The current docker dev scripts for actual only install the dependencies once, when it sees that directory as empty. So to get ANY new dependencies you currently need to remove that directory to get the dependency install to happen again.

Thanks for the node_modules advice! FWIW confirming that I can run without issues after removing node_modules directory and incorporating the fixes from #2304. Cheers!

Is the node_modules removal advice documented somewhere? If not, it might be a good idea to include it in for example CONTRIBUTING.md for others like me, who wish to contribute, but aren't that well versed in JS tool chain ecosystem.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1917595676 --> @jaarasys-henria commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2024): > @jaarasys-henria thanks for calling out this workflow. There is a bug here. Fixed by #2304 > > But from your error you also need to remove your `node_modules` directory to get the new dependencies. The current docker dev scripts for actual only install the dependencies once, when it sees that directory as empty. So to get ANY new dependencies you currently need to remove that directory to get the dependency install to happen again. Thanks for the node_modules advice! FWIW confirming that I can run without issues after removing `node_modules` directory and incorporating the fixes from #2304. Cheers! Is the `node_modules` removal advice documented somewhere? If not, it might be a good idea to include it in for example `CONTRIBUTING.md` for others like me, who wish to contribute, but aren't that well versed in JS tool chain ecosystem.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#42559
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?