github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-03-09 19:52:56 -05:00
Code Issues 250 Packages Projects Releases 53 Wiki Activity

[Maintenance] build script upgrade #268

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-28 18:54:55 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 5 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 18:54:55 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @MatissJanis on GitHub (Feb 13, 2023).

Verified feature request does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

💻

  • Would you like to implement this feature?

Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve?

We currently use a very old version of webpack. We should either upgrade it + the other dependencies or move to a better build system.

Some alternatives to consider:

  • esbuild
  • vite
  • back to create-react-app managed version
  • swc
  • ?

Some more info:
40a23f3263/CONTRIBUTING.md (ditching-babel)

Describe your ideal solution to this problem

No response

Teaching and learning

No response

Originally created by @MatissJanis on GitHub (Feb 13, 2023). ### Verified feature request does not already exist? - [X] I have searched and found no existing issue ### 💻 - [ ] Would you like to implement this feature? ### Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve? We currently use a very old version of webpack. We should either upgrade it + the other dependencies or move to a better build system. Some alternatives to consider: - esbuild - vite - back to create-react-app managed version - swc - ? Some more info: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/blob/40a23f326341b665298561f4dbd8b4d8296e3365/CONTRIBUTING.md#ditching-babel ### Describe your ideal solution to this problem _No response_ ### Teaching and learning _No response_
GiteaMirror added the tech debt label 2026-02-28 18:54:55 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 18:54:56 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@j-f1 commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2023):

Earlier attempts:

@j-f1 commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2023): Earlier attempts: - https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/142 - https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/109 - https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/108 - https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/84
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 18:54:57 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2023):

desktop-client has been moved back to CRA.

We still need to figure out a solution for loot-core. Maybe we should consider rollup for it? Or another bundler that's good for building small libraries? TBD

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2023): `desktop-client` has been moved back to CRA. We still need to figure out a solution for `loot-core`. Maybe we should consider rollup for it? Or another bundler that's good for building small libraries? TBD
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 18:54:57 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@j-f1 commented on GitHub (Jun 15, 2023):

Current status: we’re using the latest version of Webpack at the moment for all packages. I think we’re in a much better place than we were before, but it would be nice to switch to something that builds a bit faster so development can be easier.

@j-f1 commented on GitHub (Jun 15, 2023): Current status: we’re using the latest version of Webpack at the moment for all packages. I think we’re in a much better place than we were before, but it would be nice to switch to something that builds a bit faster so development can be easier.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 18:54:57 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MikesGlitch commented on GitHub (Dec 8, 2023):

My vote is for Vite because of its build speed, community, and easy config.

I've never used SWC - it looks interesting...

@MikesGlitch commented on GitHub (Dec 8, 2023): My vote is for Vite because of its build speed, community, and easy config. I've never used SWC - it looks interesting...
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 18:54:58 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2024):

We're now using vite which is a significant improvement.

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2024): We're now using vite which is a significant improvement.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label tech debt
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#268
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?