[Bug]: Reconciling can change transfers back to normal transactions #2641

Closed
opened 2026-02-28 20:22:44 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @Dagur on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025).

Verified issue does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

What happened?

I import all my transactions using the API and then I manually edit transfers between my accounts so that everything adds up.
What I've been seeing lately is that when I reconcile, the transactions that I marked as transfers are changed back to normal transactions so I need to redo this and reconcile again.

How can we reproduce the issue?

Import a transaction, modify it so it's a transfer between two of your accounts, reconcile.

Where are you hosting Actual?

Docker

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

Other

Operating System

Linux

Originally created by @Dagur on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025). ### Verified issue does not already exist? - [x] I have searched and found no existing issue ### What happened? I import all my transactions using the API and then I manually edit transfers between my accounts so that everything adds up. What I've been seeing lately is that when I reconcile, the transactions that I marked as transfers are changed back to normal transactions so I need to redo this and reconcile again. ### How can we reproduce the issue? Import a transaction, modify it so it's a transfer between two of your accounts, reconcile. ### Where are you hosting Actual? Docker ### What browsers are you seeing the problem on? Other ### Operating System Linux
GiteaMirror added the needs infobug labels 2026-02-28 20:22:44 -06:00
Author
Owner

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025):

We will need a way to recreate the issue. The reconcile process should only change the locked state and nothing else.

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025): We will need a way to recreate the issue. The reconcile process should only change the locked state and nothing else.
Author
Owner

@Dagur commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025):

I'll try to find some reproduction steps but it's ticky since this doesn't happen consistently.

@Dagur commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025): I'll try to find some reproduction steps but it's ticky since this doesn't happen consistently.
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2025):

This issue has been automatically closed because there have been no comments for 7 days after the "needs info" label was added. If you still need help, please feel free to reopen the issue with the requested information.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2025): This issue has been automatically closed because there have been no comments for 7 days after the "needs info" label was added. If you still need help, please feel free to reopen the issue with the requested information.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#2641