github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-07 04:18:51 -05:00
Code Issues 1.6k Packages Projects Releases 55 Wiki Activity

[Bug]: Filter on Split transaction discrepancy #2172

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-28 20:05:26 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 5 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 20:05:26 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @pogman-code on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025).

Verified issue does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

What happened?

If you have a note on a split transaction (the main/mother transaction), you can filter using the "Notes" with the content of the note.

But if you use the same filter in a report, it does not work.

How can we reproduce the issue?

Image

Where are you hosting Actual?

Locally via Yarn

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

Chrome

Operating System

Linux

Originally created by @pogman-code on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025). ### Verified issue does not already exist? - [x] I have searched and found no existing issue ### What happened? If you have a note on a split transaction (the main/mother transaction), you can filter using the "Notes" with the content of the note. But if you use the same filter in a report, it does not work. ### How can we reproduce the issue? ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e1ddfb7-5961-4906-9afc-cb8e91ca331e) ### Where are you hosting Actual? Locally via Yarn ### What browsers are you seeing the problem on? Chrome ### Operating System Linux
GiteaMirror added the bug label 2026-02-28 20:05:26 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 20:05:27 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025):

Why is it not working? Both pages show 0 filtered balance. (Thats probably a different issue that I think is already reported)

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025): Why is it not working? Both pages show 0 filtered balance. (Thats probably a different issue that I think is already reported)
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 20:05:27 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pogman-code commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025):

I did not notice the "Filtered balance" being at 0 on the first screen and the gif is truncated, my bad

Image

As you can see in this screenshot, I was expecting an amount of 1.13 being shown as "filtered", I guess there is no discrepancy then, just that filtering on the "main" transaction ends up being a bit misleading, right?

@pogman-code commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025): I did not notice the "Filtered balance" being at 0 on the first screen and the gif is truncated, my bad ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7f42e21c-cb51-4d44-ac94-b4a51d37a9bd) As you can see in this screenshot, I was expecting an amount of 1.13 being shown as "filtered", I guess there is no discrepancy then, just that filtering on the "main" transaction ends up being a bit misleading, right?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 20:05:28 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025):

Yeah, just that the filtering is a bit strange. I believe its because the parent transaction is the one you filtered for and it is considered to have an amount of 0 so the child transactions don't cause double counting other places.

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025): Yeah, just that the filtering is a bit strange. I believe its because the parent transaction is the one you filtered for and it is considered to have an amount of 0 so the child transactions don't cause double counting other places.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 20:05:28 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pogman-code commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025):

OK, I understand, I'll try to find a workaround for filtering those then :)

@pogman-code commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025): OK, I understand, I'll try to find a workaround for filtering those then :)
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 20:05:28 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025):

This is essentially the same bug as #4381

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2025): This is essentially the same bug as #4381
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#2172
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?