[Feature] Add 'T' shortcut to create transfer from two transactions #2110

Closed
opened 2026-02-28 20:03:40 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @axelsimon on GitHub (May 9, 2025).

Verified feature request does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

💻

  • Would you like to implement this feature?

Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve?

Mark two opposing transactions as a transfer faster / with less friction.

Describe your ideal solution to this problem

When two transactions are selected, it's possible to press F (Find) to see only those transactions, D to Delete them and S to link them to a schedule.

Being able to press T to connect the two as a transfer would be a nice usability improvement.

Teaching and learning

This would show up in the list of shortcuts the same way the others do.

Originally created by @axelsimon on GitHub (May 9, 2025). ### Verified feature request does not already exist? - [x] I have searched and found no existing issue ### 💻 - [ ] Would you like to implement this feature? ### Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve? Mark two opposing transactions as a transfer faster / with less friction. ### Describe your ideal solution to this problem When two transactions are selected, it's possible to press F (Find) to see only those transactions, D to Delete them and S to link them to a schedule. Being able to press T to connect the two as a transfer would be a nice usability improvement. ### Teaching and learning This would show up in the list of shortcuts the same way the others do.
GiteaMirror added the featureneeds votes labels 2026-02-28 20:03:40 -06:00
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 9, 2025):

Thanks for sharing your idea!

This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution).

The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+

Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍!

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 9, 2025): :sparkles: Thanks for sharing your idea! :sparkles: This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution). The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+ Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍! <!-- feature-auto-close-comment -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#2110