[GH-ISSUE #6742] [Feedback]: Budget Analysis report #17088

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2026-04-14T20:02:15-05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:15 -05:00

Originally created by @youngcw on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742

Add all feedback for the Budget Analysis report here. Original PR #6137

Originally created by @youngcw on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742 Add all feedback for the Budget Analysis report here. Original PR #6137

GiteaMirror added the feedback experimental feature labels 2026-04-14 20:02:15 -05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:15 -05:00

@Juulz commented on GitHub (Jan 25, 2026):

Thank you for your work on this!
Balance is using numberNeutral. That is mostly set for zeros and is set to be the same as pageTextSubdued and is really hard to see. There are already variables to use, reportsBlue or reportsGray that would show up well.

Actual Light Theme

@Juulz commented on GitHub (Jan 25, 2026): Thank you for your work on this! Balance is using numberNeutral. That is mostly set for zeros and is set to be the same as pageTextSubdued and is really hard to see. There are already variables to use, reportsBlue or reportsGray that would show up well. Actual Light Theme <img width="342" height="303" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/15ab5543-02c8-4651-bad2-e3a006e6461d" />

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:16 -05:00

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2026):

@Juulz Feel free to put in a PR for that since the colors are new all over

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2026): @Juulz Feel free to put in a PR for that since the colors are new all over

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:16 -05:00

@sexyskinnybitch commented on GitHub (Feb 2, 2026):

Can this also take into account when "cover overspending" was used? I never leave any categories over spent at month end, I always cover any overspending from some other category, but it still should report that it was overspent. The details are logged in the month notes, so it shouldn't be all that hard to figure it out.

example:
I budget $100 for eating out, spend $120. I use the cover overspending to pull $20 from my grocery category to cover the overspending. I want to be able to see that I did in fact over spend in the eating out category, even though I covered it before month end.

@sexyskinnybitch commented on GitHub (Feb 2, 2026): Can this also take into account when "cover overspending" was used? I never leave any categories over spent at month end, I always cover any overspending from some other category, but it still should report that it was overspent. The details are logged in the month notes, so it shouldn't be all that hard to figure it out. example: I budget $100 for eating out, spend $120. I use the cover overspending to pull $20 from my grocery category to cover the overspending. I want to be able to see that I did in fact over spend in the eating out category, even though I covered it before month end.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:16 -05:00

@niffelheimba commented on GitHub (Feb 3, 2026):

I love the overall idea of this widget, but I think there should be an option to have the bars overlap/stacked. I think default layout makes for a poor experience trying to view all four bars for every month, for two main reasons:

You have to jump between the positive and negative side of the axis and read the number to get an actual point of comparison between your income and expenses. With a stacked bar, you only have to look at one side of the axis and the overlapping sizes give you a general basis of comparison without needing to read the numbers.
This is exaggerated by requiring three bars + a line for each period, which can be significantly exaggerated considering most people will be looking at a 6-12 month horizon for their view (24-48 bars).

@niffelheimba commented on GitHub (Feb 3, 2026): I love the overall idea of this widget, but I think there should be an option to have the bars overlap/stacked. I think default layout makes for a poor experience trying to view all four bars for every month, for two main reasons: 1. You have to jump between the positive and negative side of the axis and read the number to get an actual point of comparison between your income and expenses. With a stacked bar, you only have to look at one side of the axis and the overlapping sizes give you a general basis of comparison without needing to read the numbers. 2. This is exaggerated by requiring three bars + a line for each period, which can be significantly exaggerated considering most people will be looking at a 6-12 month horizon for their view (24-48 bars).

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:16 -05:00

@Juulz commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2026):

I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes.

@Juulz commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2026): I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:16 -05:00

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2026):

I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes.

The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2026): > I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes. The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:17 -05:00

@skynet-gh commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026):

The widget only shows 6 months on Reports, even when you click through, change to 1 year, and save.

@skynet-gh commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026): The widget only shows 6 months on Reports, even when you click through, change to 1 year, and save.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:17 -05:00

@tabedzki commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026):

Can this also take into account when "cover overspending" was used? I never leave any categories over spent at month end, I always cover any overspending from some other category, but it still should report that it was overspent. The details are logged in the month notes, so it shouldn't be all that hard to figure it out.

I don't believe there's a way to take into account the amount that you additionally allocated to cover the overspending. In the example provided, the $120 becomes the new budgeted amount. @youngcw can you correct me if I'm wrong?

You have to jump between the positive and negative side of the axis and read the number to get an actual point of comparison between your income and expenses. With a stacked bar, you only have to look at one side of the axis and the overlapping sizes give you a general basis of comparison without needing to read the numbers.

I understand where you're coming from. Would you be able to provide your feedback on #6877, which is deployed here.

The one problem we'll have to tackle is transparency/overlap since I was able to concoct a Budget.zip wherein the Spent bar is hidden behind Overspending Adj bar (December 2025 in the test budget).

The widget only shows 6 months on Reports, even when you click through, change to 1 year, and save.

This should be fixed in #6875. Can you take a look at it here?

@tabedzki commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026): > Can this also take into account when "cover overspending" was used? I never leave any categories over spent at month end, I always cover any overspending from some other category, but it still should report that it was overspent. The details are logged in the month notes, so it shouldn't be all that hard to figure it out. I don't believe there's a way to take into account the amount that you additionally allocated to cover the overspending. In the example provided, the $120 becomes the new budgeted amount. @youngcw can you correct me if I'm wrong? --- > You have to jump between the positive and negative side of the axis and read the number to get an actual point of comparison between your income and expenses. With a stacked bar, you only have to look at one side of the axis and the overlapping sizes give you a general basis of comparison without needing to read the numbers. I understand where you're coming from. Would you be able to provide your feedback on #6877, which is deployed [here](https://deploy-preview-6877.demo.actualbudget.org). The one problem we'll have to tackle is transparency/overlap since I was able to concoct a [Budget.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25112143/2026-02-05-Test.Budget.1.zip) wherein the Spent bar is hidden behind Overspending Adj bar (December 2025 in the test budget). --- > The widget only shows 6 months on Reports, even when you click through, change to 1 year, and save. This should be fixed in #6875. Can you take a look at it [here](https://deploy-preview-6875.demo.actualbudget.org)?

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:18 -05:00

@sexyskinnybitch commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026):

It could be done if the month notes are parsed. All the "cover overspending" is logged there.

Dana
They/Them

2026-02-05T21:38:20Z tabedzki @.***>:

 [Image]*tabedzki* left a comment (actualbudget/actual#6742)[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742#issuecomment-3856385520]
Can this also take into account when "cover overspending" was used? I never leave any categories over spent at month end, I always cover any overspending from some other category, but it still should report that it was overspent. The details are logged in the month notes, so it shouldn't be all that hard to figure it out.

I don't believe there's a way to take into account the amount that you additionally allocated to cover the overspending. In the example provided, the $120 becomes the new budgeted amount. @youngcw[https://github.com/youngcw] can you correct me if I'm wrong?

You have to jump between the positive and negative side of the axis and read the number to get an actual point of comparison between your income and expenses. With a stacked bar, you only have to look at one side of the axis and the overlapping sizes give you a general basis of comparison without needing to read the numbers.

I understand where you're coming from. Would you be able to provide your feedback on #6877[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/6877], which is deployed here[https://deploy-preview-6877.demo.actualbudget.org].

The one problem we'll have to tackle is transparency/overlap since I was able to concoct a Budget.zip[https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25112143/2026-02-05-Test.Budget.1.zip] wherein the Spent bar is hidden behind Overspending Adj bar (December 2025 in the test budget).

The widget only shows 6 months on Reports, even when you click through, change to 1 year, and save.

This should be fixed in #6874[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/6874]. Can you take a look at it here[https://deploy-preview-6875.demo.actualbudget.org]?

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742#issuecomment-3856385520], or unsubscribe[https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BPBEY25VBWTTFAWSPREDRCL4KOZ2DAVCNFSM6AAAAACSOERWAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTQNJWGM4DKNJSGA].
You are receiving this because you commented.
[Tracking image][https://github.com/notifications/beacon/BPBEY27ZM6OTBUFJ2I7H5UD4KOZ2DA5CNFSM6AAAAACSOERWAKWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTXF3PC7A.gif]

@sexyskinnybitch commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026): It could be done if the month notes are parsed. All the "cover overspending" is logged there. Dana They/Them 2026-02-05T21:38:20Z tabedzki ***@***.***>: > > [Image]*tabedzki* left a comment (actualbudget/actual#6742)[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742#issuecomment-3856385520] > > > Can this also take into account when "cover overspending" was used? I never leave any categories over spent at month end, I always cover any overspending from some other category, but it still should report that it was overspent. The details are logged in the month notes, so it shouldn't be all that hard to figure it out. > > I don't believe there's a way to take into account the amount that you additionally allocated to cover the overspending. In the example provided, the $120 becomes the new budgeted amount. @youngcw[https://github.com/youngcw] can you correct me if I'm wrong? > > ---------------------------------------- > > You have to jump between the positive and negative side of the axis and read the number to get an actual point of comparison between your income and expenses. With a stacked bar, you only have to look at one side of the axis and the overlapping sizes give you a general basis of comparison without needing to read the numbers. > > I understand where you're coming from. Would you be able to provide your feedback on #6877[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/6877], which is deployed here[https://deploy-preview-6877.demo.actualbudget.org]. > > The one problem we'll have to tackle is transparency/overlap since I was able to concoct a Budget.zip[https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25112143/2026-02-05-Test.Budget.1.zip] wherein the Spent bar is hidden behind Overspending Adj bar (December 2025 in the test budget). > > ---------------------------------------- > > The widget only shows 6 months on Reports, even when you click through, change to 1 year, and save. > > This should be fixed in #6874[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/6874]. Can you take a look at it here[https://deploy-preview-6875.demo.actualbudget.org]? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742#issuecomment-3856385520], or unsubscribe[https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BPBEY25VBWTTFAWSPREDRCL4KOZ2DAVCNFSM6AAAAACSOERWAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTQNJWGM4DKNJSGA]. > You are receiving this because you commented. > [Tracking image][https://github.com/notifications/beacon/BPBEY27ZM6OTBUFJ2I7H5UD4KOZ2DA5CNFSM6AAAAACSOERWAKWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTXF3PC7A.gif] >

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:18 -05:00

@skynet-gh commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026):

@tabedzki yep #6875 fixes it!

@skynet-gh commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026): @tabedzki yep #6875 fixes it!

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:18 -05:00

@Juulz commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026):

I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes.

The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report

While true, I think that scenario is an outlier. Perhaps a choice in the report?

@Juulz commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026): > > I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes. > > The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report While true, I think that scenario is an outlier. Perhaps a choice in the report?

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:19 -05:00

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026):

I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes.

The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report

While true, I think that scenario is an outlier. Perhaps a choice in the report?

I think per category it wont be especially uncommon. On a whole budget scale, yes, per category, no.

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026): > > > I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes. > > > > > > The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report > > While true, I think that scenario is an outlier. Perhaps a choice in the report? I think per category it wont be especially uncommon. On a whole budget scale, yes, per category, no.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:19 -05:00

@tabedzki commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026):

I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes.

The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report

While true, I think that scenario is an outlier. Perhaps a choice in the report?

I think per category it wont be especially uncommon. On a whole budget scale, yes, per category, no.

Easiest example I can think of is cancelling a trip or flight in a later month; any refund is likely to cause the category to be positive, especially if you're not buying flights frequently.

It could be done if the month notes are parsed. All the "cover overspending" is logged there.

I don't know much about the month notes and parsing them. If you have knowledge with them, I'd appreciate the support on getting this implemented.

@tabedzki commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026): > > > > I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes. > > > > > > > > > The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report > > > > > > While true, I think that scenario is an outlier. Perhaps a choice in the report? > > I think per category it wont be especially uncommon. On a whole budget scale, yes, per category, no. Easiest example I can think of is cancelling a trip or flight in a later month; any refund is likely to cause the category to be positive, especially if you're not buying flights frequently. --- > It could be done if the month notes are parsed. All the "cover overspending" is logged there. I don't know much about the month notes and parsing them. If you have knowledge with them, I'd appreciate the support on getting this implemented.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:19 -05:00

@sexyskinnybitch commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026):

Sadly, my coding skills don't apply to this.

Dana
They/Them

2026-02-06T00:11:51Z tabedzki @.***>:

 [Image]*tabedzki* left a comment (actualbudget/actual#6742)[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742#issuecomment-3857082017]
I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes.

The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report

While true, I think that scenario is an outlier. Perhaps a choice in the report?

I think per category it wont be especially uncommon. On a whole budget scale, yes, per category, no.

Easiest example I can think of is cancelling a trip or flight in a later month; any refund is likely to be positive, and if you're not buying flights frequently, this can easily happen.

It could be done if the month notes are parsed. All the "cover overspending" is logged there.

I don't know much about the month notes and parsing them. If you have knowledge with them, I'd appreciate the support on getting this implemented.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742#issuecomment-3857082017], or unsubscribe[https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BPBEY245H457L2VFLAUIAPL4KPLZ3AVCNFSM6AAAAACSOERWAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTQNJXGA4DEMBRG4].
You are receiving this because you commented.
[Tracking image][https://github.com/notifications/beacon/BPBEY2YUTFOAKTM2WNFZYDD4KPLZ3A5CNFSM6AAAAACSOERWAKWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTXF4ZTKC.gif]

@sexyskinnybitch commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026): Sadly, my coding skills don't apply to this. Dana They/Them 2026-02-06T00:11:51Z tabedzki ***@***.***>: > > [Image]*tabedzki* left a comment (actualbudget/actual#6742)[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742#issuecomment-3857082017] > > > I also think the report would be easier to read if all of the values were absolutes. > > The problem with absolute bars is what if the spending total is positve? Like you received a large refund or something. The current bars match the cashflow report > > While true, I think that scenario is an outlier. Perhaps a choice in the report? > > I think per category it wont be especially uncommon. On a whole budget scale, yes, per category, no. > > Easiest example I can think of is cancelling a trip or flight in a later month; any refund is likely to be positive, and if you're not buying flights frequently, this can easily happen. > > ---------------------------------------- > > It could be done if the month notes are parsed. All the "cover overspending" is logged there. > > I don't know much about the month notes and parsing them. If you have knowledge with them, I'd appreciate the support on getting this implemented. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub[https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/6742#issuecomment-3857082017], or unsubscribe[https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BPBEY245H457L2VFLAUIAPL4KPLZ3AVCNFSM6AAAAACSOERWAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTQNJXGA4DEMBRG4]. > You are receiving this because you commented. > [Tracking image][https://github.com/notifications/beacon/BPBEY2YUTFOAKTM2WNFZYDD4KPLZ3A5CNFSM6AAAAACSOERWAKWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTXF4ZTKC.gif] >

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:20 -05:00

@TacticalPidgeon9941 commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2026):

What happened?

When using the Budget Analysis report with the new Category Group filter (added in #6834), the totals shown (Budgeted, Spent, Balance) do not match the totals shown when selecting each individual category within that same category group.

What I was trying to do: Use the new Category Group filter in the Budget Analysis report to view totals for a specific category group.

What I expected to happen: Filtering by a Category Group should produce the same totals (Budgeted, Spent, Balance) as selecting all individual categories within that group manually using the “one of” category filter.
I.e.: Category Group filter = Sum of all categories within that group

What actually happened: When filtering by Category Group, the totals shown (Budgeted, Spent, Balance) appear to reflect the entire budget, not just the selected category group.

However, when filtering by category → “one of”, selecting each individual category inside the same category group, the totals reflect only that group’s categories (which appears correct).

Error messages

None.

How can we reproduce the issue?

Navigate to Reports
Open Budget Analysis
In Filters, select:
Filter by Category Group
Choose a specific category group (e.g., “Housing” or any group with multiple categories)
Observe the totals
Make new Budget Analysis report
Add a filter:
Category → “is one of”
Manually select every individual category inside the same category group used above
Keep the same timeline as before.
Compare the totals

Where are you hosting Actual?

Docker

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

Firefox

Operating System

Windows 11

@TacticalPidgeon9941 commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2026): ### What happened? When using the Budget Analysis report with the new Category Group filter (added in #6834), the totals shown (Budgeted, Spent, Balance) do not match the totals shown when selecting each individual category within that same category group. What I was trying to do: Use the new Category Group filter in the Budget Analysis report to view totals for a specific category group. What I expected to happen: Filtering by a Category Group should produce the same totals (Budgeted, Spent, Balance) as selecting all individual categories within that group manually using the “one of” category filter. I.e.: Category Group filter = Sum of all categories within that group What actually happened: When filtering by Category Group, the totals shown (Budgeted, Spent, Balance) appear to reflect the entire budget, not just the selected category group. However, when filtering by category → “one of”, selecting each individual category inside the same category group, the totals reflect only that group’s categories (which appears correct). Error messages None. <img width="689" height="228" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1c130433-18fe-4c75-9656-115941d066e2" /> <img width="1669" height="684" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1d595c6a-8e2b-4494-adc0-3b9ba8a06a90" /> <img width="1666" height="724" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/97a23330-af89-4b13-91fe-5fc12f693130" /> ### How can we reproduce the issue? 1. Navigate to Reports 2. Open Budget Analysis 3. In Filters, select: Filter by Category Group Choose a specific category group (e.g., “Housing” or any group with multiple categories) 4. Observe the totals 5. Make new Budget Analysis report 6. Add a filter: Category → “is one of” Manually select every individual category inside the same category group used above 7. Keep the same timeline as before. 8. Compare the totals ### Where are you hosting Actual? Docker ### What browsers are you seeing the problem on? Firefox ### Operating System Windows 11

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:21 -05:00

@marci-makes commented on GitHub (Mar 26, 2026):

It would be nice to have the option to show only the balance, and hide the bar graphs. Similar to what a Net worth graph looks like. I would use this for example for categories where I save for long term goals, like vacations, rainy day funds, etc.

@marci-makes commented on GitHub (Mar 26, 2026): It would be nice to have the option to show only the balance, and hide the bar graphs. Similar to what a Net worth graph looks like. I would use this for example for categories where I save for long term goals, like vacations, rainy day funds, etc.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-14 20:02:21 -05:00

@A5308Y commented on GitHub (Apr 3, 2026):

It would be nice to have the option to show only the balance, and hide the bar graphs. Similar to what a Net worth graph looks like. I would use this for example for categories where I save for long term goals, like vacations, rainy day funds, etc.

For long term goals it would also be nice if we could select future months.

@A5308Y commented on GitHub (Apr 3, 2026): > It would be nice to have the option to show only the balance, and hide the bar graphs. Similar to what a Net worth graph looks like. I would use this for example for categories where I save for long term goals, like vacations, rainy day funds, etc. For long term goals it would also be nice if we could select future months.

Sign in to join this conversation.

Branches Tags

master

claude/hide-default-categories-1cwBZ

matiss/crdt-source-loading

youngcw/unlock-duplicates

matiss/crdt-protobuf

release/26.5.0

claude/update-issue-template-ykMNn

claude/fix-issue-7667-DPXi3

cursor/formula-feedback-improvements-4223

cursor/resolve-pr-7449-ee11

claude/fix-typescript-build-error-JPtZ5

jfdoming/api-tokens-part-3

jfdoming/api-tokens-part-2

jfdoming/api-tokens-part-1

claude/speed-up-vrt-workflow-ZAyI5

claude/crdt-version-auto-publish-Ph1BH

copilot/add-repository-configs-to-packages

worktree-compressed-drifting-ritchie

worktree-mellow-strolling-dawn

matiss/browser-api

claude/api-consumer-verification-kfz1K

feature/enable-banking

cursor/transaction-table-rewrite-f077

pr-7454

claude/fix-issue-7410-LLLQ4

release/v100.0.0

revert-7350-trim-deps

revert-7220-sankey-report

revert-7242-fix/split-parent-update-corruption

revert-7281-generate-icons

claude/electron-to-tauri-migration-LjBN8

worktree-remotion

release/vv26.4.0-pre

claude/browser-compatible-api-QbhHh

claude/improve-cli-transactions-waTUY

claude/publish-react-native-ios-j8qoT

js-proxy

claude/fix-flaky-ci-job-5gDdz

react-query-rules

react-query-useSchedules

claude/nightly-theme-validation-scan-DzOGD

claude/debug-simplefin-error-ZuKzB

matiss/desktop-client-subpath-imports

claude/fix-simplefin-ssrf-T31gX

claude/release-notes-validation-X7rvR

add-claude-github-actions-1772738270730

cursor/sync-performance-notification-9899

react-query-prefs

matiss/chunked-sync-and-progress-ux

v26.2.1

copilot/sub-pr-6880

fix-react-query-clear-on-close-budget

copilot/sub-pr-6140

feat/auto-note

feat/scoped-bank-sync

cursor/desktop-transactions-react-table-1d0c

fix-exhaustive-deps-App

copilot/fix-find-replace-bug

release/v26.2.0-pre

matiss/browser-tests

mobile-fix-drag-and-drop-across-groups

budget-table-v2

PayeeAutocomplete2

pglite

bugfix/plugins/fix-plugins-sw

feat/plugins/plugins-core-package

prerelease

matiss/unicode-minus-fix

cursor/fix-actual-github-issue-6206-gemini-3-pro-preview-9c37

TransactionFormPage

cursor/implement-mortgage-and-loan-account-type-78ca

tests-update-fill-with-pressSequentially

mobile/link-modal

deps/25.11

cursor/fix-update-vrt-apply-ci-job-dispatch-b324

sync-server-plugins

cursor/propose-patch-for-github-issue-5680-2a18

fix/compiler-preserve-inner-dollar-escapes

cursor/analyze-actual-budget-issue-and-propose-fix-5b70

coderabbitai/docstrings/0c070e5

cursor/add-wip-prefix-and-comment-to-prs-d78d

jfdoming/08-21-auto-focus-on-navigate-in-all-browsers

show-totals-on-mobile-budget-banners

allow-child-transactions-make-transfer

mobile-calculator-keyboard

payee-geolocation

enhance/restore_scroll_position

dm-fix-second-click-on-mobile-new-transaction-2

scrollToLocationBudget

alert-autofix-38

tsconfig-composite

mobile-fix-uncategorized-transactions-on-tracking-budgets

server-budget-handlers

fix-sql-injection-in-cleanup-template

non-chrome-draggable-workaround

mobile-budget-page-swipe-navigation

ts-db-all

stable

dark-theme-with-brand-colors

fix-mobile-delete-group

ts-db-select

UnderKoen/reconcile-context-menu

master-before-server-merge

v25.2.1

ts-runQuery

rename-redux-hooks

UnderKoen/3557-persist-state-in-history

remove-redux-CLOSE_BUDGET

fix-exhaustive-deps-errors-FinancesApp

redux-toolkit-createSlice-backup

accounts-function-component

ts-useSplitsExpanded

loot-core-server-package

useTransactios-in-TransactionEdit

react-aria-input

move-redux-to-desktop-client

QueryState-type

fix-themes-applied-late

mobile-vrts

revert-3295-spendingCardFix

react-aria-button-4

split-payee-on-mobile

twk3/pin-apis-crdt

notes-tag-autocomplete

ts-LoadBackup

dnd-kit

package-upgrades

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#17088