github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-12 01:52:09 -05:00
Code Issues 1.6k Packages Projects Releases 57 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #2503] [Feature] Hide reconciled transactions #15242

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-14 18:10:04 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 7 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 18:10:04 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @dasunsrule32 on GitHub (Mar 24, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2503

Verified feature request does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

💻

  • Would you like to implement this feature?

Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve?

YNAB has the option to hide reconciled transactions. It would be nice to have a permanent option that can be toggled off or on the ability to hide reconciled transactions.

You can do it it under a custom filter, but you have to enable the filter every time you switch accounts.

Describe your ideal solution to this problem

No response

Teaching and learning

No response

Originally created by @dasunsrule32 on GitHub (Mar 24, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2503 ### Verified feature request does not already exist? - [X] I have searched and found no existing issue ### 💻 - [ ] Would you like to implement this feature? ### Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve? YNAB has the option to hide reconciled transactions. It would be nice to have a permanent option that can be toggled off or on the ability to hide reconciled transactions. You can do it it under a custom filter, but you have to enable the filter every time you switch accounts. ### Describe your ideal solution to this problem _No response_ ### Teaching and learning _No response_
GiteaMirror added the feature label 2026-04-14 18:10:04 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 18:10:06 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2024):

✨ Thanks for sharing your idea! ✨

This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution).

The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+

Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍!

<!-- gh-comment-id:2016936472 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2024): :sparkles: Thanks for sharing your idea! :sparkles: This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution). The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+ Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍! <!-- feature-auto-close-comment -->
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 18:10:06 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@davidkus commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2024):

Implemented this here #2542

<!-- gh-comment-id:2037507319 --> @davidkus commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2024): Implemented this here #2542
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 18:10:07 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dasunsrule32 commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2024):

Implemented this here #2542

This is awesome! Can't wait to try it out. Thank you for working on this.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2037629104 --> @dasunsrule32 commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2024): > Implemented this here #2542 This is awesome! Can't wait to try it out. Thank you for working on this.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 18:10:07 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ToniCipriani commented on GitHub (May 3, 2024):

Just updated to 24.5.0 and now have the options. Seems like some transactions are still not properly hidden, specifically split transactions and transfers.

EDIT: Found the issue, seems like this is due to my YNAB4 import. The transfers and split childs are not considered reconciled. I ran another reconciile and that fixed the issue.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2093640251 --> @ToniCipriani commented on GitHub (May 3, 2024): Just updated to 24.5.0 and now have the options. Seems like some transactions are still not properly hidden, specifically split transactions and transfers. EDIT: Found the issue, seems like this is due to my YNAB4 import. The transfers and split childs are not considered reconciled. I ran another reconciile and that fixed the issue.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 18:10:07 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (May 3, 2024):

If there are issues with the feature (or imports, or anything else) - please open a new bug issue. I don't think anyone is actively monitoring feature tickets that are complete.

Also: thanks for implementing this! Great feature!

<!-- gh-comment-id:2093664064 --> @MatissJanis commented on GitHub (May 3, 2024): If there are issues with the feature (or imports, or anything else) - please open a new bug issue. I don't think anyone is actively monitoring feature tickets that are complete. Also: thanks for implementing this! Great feature!
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 18:10:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@SamRodkey commented on GitHub (May 4, 2024):

I find the behavior confusing/unexpected when I see my running balances change when I hide/unhide my reconciled transactions. Why do these numbers change?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2094151378 --> @SamRodkey commented on GitHub (May 4, 2024): I find the behavior confusing/unexpected when I see my running balances change when I hide/unhide my reconciled transactions. Why do these numbers change?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 18:10:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (May 4, 2024):

@SamRodkey please open a new issue detailing what you are seeing

<!-- gh-comment-id:2094210592 --> @youngcw commented on GitHub (May 4, 2024): @SamRodkey please open a new issue detailing what you are seeing
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#15242
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?