github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-03-10 20:23:07 -05:00
Code Issues 250 Packages Projects Releases 53 Wiki Activity

[Feature] Sort accounts #1259

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-28 19:37:46 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:37:46 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @TheBlueCircle on GitHub (Jul 20, 2024).

Verified feature request does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

💻

  • Would you like to implement this feature?

Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve?

I have a large number of accounts. I would like to have a better way of ordering them in the left-hand menu (desktop view) rather than relying on drag and drop.

Describe your ideal solution to this problem

Ideally, there would be a way to automatically sort accounts under each account group. This could involve an automated function to sort accounts:

  • alphabetically
  • By value
  • By last transaction

UI options would need to be worked up, but there could feasibly be some icon / option on each category group to access sorting (and potentially other future) options.

Teaching and learning

No response

Originally created by @TheBlueCircle on GitHub (Jul 20, 2024). ### Verified feature request does not already exist? - [X] I have searched and found no existing issue ### 💻 - [ ] Would you like to implement this feature? ### Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve? I have a large number of accounts. I would like to have a better way of ordering them in the left-hand menu (desktop view) rather than relying on drag and drop. ### Describe your ideal solution to this problem Ideally, there would be a way to automatically sort accounts under each account group. This could involve an automated function to sort accounts: * alphabetically * By value * By last transaction UI options would need to be worked up, but there could feasibly be some icon / option on each category group to access sorting (and potentially other future) options. ### Teaching and learning _No response_
GiteaMirror added the needs votesfeature labels 2026-02-28 19:37:46 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:37:47 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2024):

✨ Thanks for sharing your idea! ✨

This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution).

The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+

Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍!

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2024): :sparkles: Thanks for sharing your idea! :sparkles: This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution). The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+ Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍! <!-- feature-auto-close-comment -->
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:37:48 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@elijaholmos commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2024):

I have the same use case. Let me propose also that we can have more granular grouping of accounts... on and off budget right now is extremely restrictive. A lot of my accounts have prefixes before them (eg "[C-P1] Account 1") and advanced grouping could let me associate attributes with my accounts for quick search, sorting, and other navigation uses.

@elijaholmos commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2024): I have the same use case. Let me propose also that we can have more granular grouping of accounts... on and off budget right now is extremely restrictive. A lot of my accounts have prefixes before them (eg "[C-P1] Account 1") and advanced grouping could let me associate attributes with my accounts for quick search, sorting, and other navigation uses.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label feature needs votes
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#1259
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?