github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-07-16 07:04:23 -05:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 58 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #7696] [Bug]: There was an unrecoverable error in the UI. Sorry! #117549

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-06-11 12:48:44 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 12 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:48:44 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @yrubdarb on GitHub (May 4, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/7696

What happened?

Updated to lasted docker actual server image
Go to the site and get error.
There was an unrecoverable error in the UI. Sorry!
Console shows
Object { name: "TypeError", message: "crypto.randomUUID is not a function", stack:
I had previously when first installed gone to the advanced and turn off the security setting

How can we reproduce the issue?

I just updated in docker to the lasted (Running on a QNAP) . I have tried Firefox Chrome and Safari same error.

Where are you hosting Actual?

Docker

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

Firefox

Operating System

Mac OSX

Originally created by @yrubdarb on GitHub (May 4, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/7696 ### What happened? Updated to lasted docker actual server image Go to the site and get error. There was an unrecoverable error in the UI. Sorry! Console shows Object { name: "TypeError", message: "crypto.randomUUID is not a function", stack: I had previously when first installed gone to the advanced and turn off the security setting ### How can we reproduce the issue? I just updated in docker to the lasted (Running on a QNAP) . I have tried Firefox Chrome and Safari same error. ### Where are you hosting Actual? Docker ### What browsers are you seeing the problem on? Firefox ### Operating System Mac OSX
GiteaMirror added the bug label 2026-06-11 12:48:44 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@huudafakk commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

Hi there,

same situation, using latest version (docker version) and got these error:

TypeError: crypto.randomUUID is not a function at http://x.x.x.x:xxxx/static/js/extends.RRv7gyle.chunk.js:5062:21 at new Promise () at send (http://x.x.x.x:xxxx/static/js/extends.RRv7gyle.chunk.js:5061:9) at init$1 (http://x.x.x.x:xxxx/static/js/index.BFVNfkrn.js:62943:30) at async Promise.all (index 1) at async initAll (http://x.x.x.x:x/static/js/index.BFVNfkrn.js:62956:5)

<!-- gh-comment-id:4369072454 --> @huudafakk commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): Hi there, same situation, using latest version (docker version) and got these error: TypeError: crypto.randomUUID is not a function at http://x.x.x.x:xxxx/static/js/extends.RRv7gyle.chunk.js:5062:21 at new Promise (<anonymous>) at send (http://x.x.x.x:xxxx/static/js/extends.RRv7gyle.chunk.js:5061:9) at init$1 (http://x.x.x.x:xxxx/static/js/index.BFVNfkrn.js:62943:30) at async Promise.all (index 1) at async initAll (http://x.x.x.x:x/static/js/index.BFVNfkrn.js:62956:5)
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@emiltb commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

See https://actualbudget.org/docs/config/https/. You need to configure HTTPS properly to access Actual from anything other than localhost.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4369197951 --> @emiltb commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): See https://actualbudget.org/docs/config/https/. You need to configure HTTPS properly to access Actual from anything other than `localhost`.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:06 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@yrubdarb commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

Is this now enforce more in the latest version because it has been working fine for months?
added the config.json and the cert and key and is working now thanks

<!-- gh-comment-id:4369311368 --> @yrubdarb commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): Is this now enforce more in the latest version because it has been working fine for months? added the config.json and the cert and key and is working now thanks
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:07 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@huudafakk commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

fixed using tailscale with the https/magic dns service, works again like charm. thank you!

<!-- gh-comment-id:4369523175 --> @huudafakk commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): fixed using tailscale with the https/magic dns service, works again like charm. thank you!
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MattDemers commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

fixed using tailscale with the https/magic dns service, works again like charm. thank you!

Can I ask how you did this? My tailscale install kind of broke.

edit: What I did to fix my Tailscale was (accidentally) resetting my configuration and then re-adding it. It seemed to work then.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4375452230 --> @MattDemers commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): > fixed using tailscale with the https/magic dns service, works again like charm. thank you! Can I ask how you did this? My tailscale install kind of broke. **edit**: What I did to fix my Tailscale was (accidentally) resetting my configuration and then re-adding it. It seemed to work then.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:09 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@manolof commented on GitHub (May 5, 2026):

@emiltb @youngcw this is kind of breaking the flow for many self-hosters who access their Actual instance via internal IP. Wouldn't it have been appropriate at least to mention this, anywhere in any changelog/release notes/upcoming plans?
I don't mean to sound entitled, honestly thanks all for the hard work on a free software.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4379688724 --> @manolof commented on GitHub (May 5, 2026): @emiltb @youngcw this is kind of breaking the flow for many self-hosters who access their Actual instance via internal IP. Wouldn't it have been appropriate at least to mention this, anywhere in any changelog/release notes/upcoming plans? I don't mean to sound entitled, honestly thanks all for the hard work on a free software.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:09 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Jeff9000 commented on GitHub (May 5, 2026):

I got the same error. Installed 26.4.0 and it now works again.

I really don't want to run HTTPS on my completely local instance of Actual that is running as Docker on Synology NAS. I'm not sure if I can even do HTTPS. This is a SHOWSTOPPER for me with versison 26.5.0.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4380402756 --> @Jeff9000 commented on GitHub (May 5, 2026): I got the same error. Installed 26.4.0 and it now works again. I really don't want to run HTTPS on my completely local instance of Actual that is running as Docker on Synology NAS. I'm not sure if I can even do HTTPS. This is a SHOWSTOPPER for me with versison 26.5.0.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:10 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@boltadvantage commented on GitHub (May 7, 2026):

See https://actualbudget.org/docs/config/https/. You need to configure HTTPS properly to access Actual from anything other than localhost.

No.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4397767690 --> @boltadvantage commented on GitHub (May 7, 2026): > See https://actualbudget.org/docs/config/https/. You need to configure HTTPS properly to access Actual from anything other than `localhost`. No.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:10 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StevenLares commented on GitHub (May 10, 2026):

I self-host through Docker, keep it local (and only remotely access through Tailscale)

If that sounds like you, I suggest pinning sha-353e12a in your Docker Compose.

Unacceptable that this flow was broken without warning, and coincidentally around the time of the first AI push: https://slopwatch.dev/repo/actualbudget/actual

<!-- gh-comment-id:4415724371 --> @StevenLares commented on GitHub (May 10, 2026): I self-host through Docker, keep it local (and only remotely access through Tailscale) If that sounds like you, I suggest pinning sha-353e12a in your Docker Compose. Unacceptable that this flow was broken without warning, and coincidentally around the time of the first AI push: https://slopwatch.dev/repo/actualbudget/actual
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:11 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pwinnski commented on GitHub (May 12, 2026):

What a weird hill to expose your personal financial data on. This isn't a media server, HTTPS should be considered a bare minimum. As the documentation says, if you already have Tailscale, you can use that, so you don't even need to use your own cert.

If you're really that determined to run insecurely, you can make up for using https://zzz.tailzzz.ts.net/ by printing out your bank statements and leaving them lying about, I suppose. 🤷

<!-- gh-comment-id:4430244469 --> @pwinnski commented on GitHub (May 12, 2026): What a weird hill to expose your personal financial data on. This isn't a media server, HTTPS should be considered a bare minimum. As the documentation says, if you already have Tailscale, you can use that, so you don't even need to use your own cert. If you're really that determined to run insecurely, you can make up for using https://zzz.tailzzz.ts.net/ by printing out your bank statements and leaving them lying about, I suppose. 🤷
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:12 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@manolof commented on GitHub (May 12, 2026):

What a weird hill to expose your personal financial data on. This isn't a media server, HTTPS should be considered a bare minimum. As the documentation says, if you already have Tailscale, you can use that, so you don't even need to use your own cert.

If you're really that determined to run insecurely, you can make up for using https://zzz.tailzzz.ts.net/ by printing out your bank statements and leaving them lying about, I suppose. 🤷

didn't fully get your response, but hey, Actual only stores numbers AFAIK, and 0 bank statements.. you're confusing it with Paperless-ngx...
And no thanks, I don't need an open-source software targeted towards self-hosters to dictate how to run my software on my own server under my desk...

<!-- gh-comment-id:4430284724 --> @manolof commented on GitHub (May 12, 2026): > What a weird hill to expose your personal financial data on. This isn't a media server, HTTPS should be considered a bare minimum. As the documentation says, if you already have Tailscale, you can use that, so you don't even need to use your own cert. > > If you're really that determined to run insecurely, you can make up for using https://zzz.tailzzz.ts.net/ by printing out your bank statements and leaving them lying about, I suppose. 🤷 didn't fully get your response, but hey, Actual only stores numbers AFAIK, and 0 bank statements.. you're confusing it with Paperless-ngx... And no thanks, I don't need an open-source software targeted towards self-hosters to dictate how to run my software on my own server under my desk...
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-11 12:49:12 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (May 12, 2026):

This is getting unnecessarily heated. The patch has been merged and released in 26.5.1 / 26.5.2.

Locking.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4430319356 --> @MatissJanis commented on GitHub (May 12, 2026): This is getting unnecessarily heated. The patch has been merged and released in 26.5.1 / 26.5.2. Locking.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
tech-support
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#117549
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?