mirror of
https://github.com/MLSysBook/TinyTorch.git
synced 2025-12-05 19:17:52 -06:00
Deleted Category 1 temporary documentation files: - Root directory: review reports, fix summaries, implementation checklists - docs/development: testing plans, review checklists, quick references - instructor/guides: analysis reports and implementation plans - tests: testing strategy document These were completed work logs and planning documents no longer needed. All active documentation (site content, module ABOUT files, READMEs) preserved.
TinyTorch Instructor Resources
This directory contains tools, guides, and resources specifically for instructors teaching with TinyTorch.
📁 Directory Structure
instructor/
├── tools/ # Analysis and utility scripts
│ ├── tinytorch_module_analyzer.py # Main module analysis tool
│ └── analysis_notebook_structure.py # Legacy analysis script
├── reports/ # Generated report cards and analysis
├── guides/ # Instructor documentation and guides
│ ├── README_analyzer.md # How to use the analyzer
│ ├── educational_analysis_report.md # Analysis findings
│ ├── educational_scaffolding_guidelines.md # Best practices
│ ├── scaffolding_analysis_and_recommendations.md # Detailed recommendations
│ ├── test_anxiety_analysis.md # Student-friendly testing guide
│ ├── implementation_plan.md # Improvement implementation plan
│ └── REORGANIZATION_PLAN.md # Repository reorganization plan
└── templates/ # Templates and examples
🔧 Quick Start
Analyze All Modules
# From repository root
python3 analyze_modules.py --all
# From instructor/tools directory
python3 tinytorch_module_analyzer.py --all
Analyze Specific Module
python3 analyze_modules.py --module 02_activations --save
Compare Modules
python3 analyze_modules.py --compare 01_tensor 02_activations 03_layers
📊 Analysis Tools
Module Analyzer (tools/tinytorch_module_analyzer.py)
Comprehensive analysis tool that generates report cards for educational quality:
- Scaffolding Quality Assessment (1-5 scale)
- Complexity Distribution Analysis
- Student Overwhelm Detection
- Learning Progression Evaluation
- Best Practice Compliance
Output Formats:
- Terminal summary
- JSON reports (programmatic use)
- HTML report cards (visual)
Report Cards (reports/)
Generated analysis reports with:
- Overall grades (A-F)
- Category breakdowns
- Specific recommendations
- Historical tracking
📚 Instructor Guides
Essential Reading
educational_scaffolding_guidelines.md- Core educational principlesscaffolding_analysis_and_recommendations.md- Detailed improvement strategiestest_anxiety_analysis.md- Student-friendly testing approachesimplementation_plan.md- Systematic improvement roadmap
Analysis Results
- Current Status: Most modules grade C with 3/5 scaffolding quality
- Key Issues: Student overwhelm, complexity cliffs, missing guidance
- Priority: Apply "Rule of 3s" and implementation ladders
🎯 Key Metrics
Target Standards
- Module Length: 200-400 lines
- Cell Length: ≤30 lines
- High-Complexity Cells: ≤30%
- Scaffolding Quality: ≥4/5
- Hint Ratio: ≥80%
Current Performance
00_setup: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
01_tensor: Grade C | Scaffolding 2/5
02_activations: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
03_layers: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
04_networks: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
05_cnn: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
06_dataloader: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
07_autograd: Grade D | Scaffolding 2/5
🚀 Improvement Workflow
- Baseline Analysis: Run analyzer on all modules
- Identify Priorities: Focus on lowest-scoring modules
- Apply Guidelines: Use scaffolding principles from guides
- Measure Progress: Re-run analysis after changes
- Track Improvement: Compare reports over time
📈 Success Stories
After applying recommendations:
- Improved scaffolding quality from 1.9/5 to 3.0/5 average
- Reduced overwhelm points significantly
- Better test experience for students
- More consistent quality across modules
🔄 Continuous Improvement
The analysis tools enable:
- Data-driven decisions about educational quality
- Objective measurement of improvement efforts
- Consistent standards across all modules
- Early detection of quality issues
💡 Best Practices
For Module Development
- Run analysis before and after major changes
- Aim for B+ grades (4/5 scaffolding quality)
- Follow "Rule of 3s" framework
- Use implementation ladders for complex concepts
For Course Management
- Regular quality audits using analysis tools
- Track improvement trends over time
- Share best practices from high-scoring modules
- Address student feedback with data
This instructor resource system transforms TinyTorch from good educational content into exceptional, data-driven ML systems education.