This picks up #2068 by adding per-badge stats as discussed in #966.
It ensures every service has a unique `name` property. By default this comes from the class name, and is overridden in all the various places where the class names are duplicated. (Some of those don't seem that useful, like the various download interval services, though those need to be refactored down into a single service anyway.) Tests enforce the names are unique. These are the names used by the service-test runner, so it's a good idea to make them unique anyway. (It was sort of strange before that you had to specify `nuget` instead of e.g. `resharper`.)
I've added validation to `deprecatedService` and `redirector`, and required that every `route` has a `base`, even if it's an empty string.
The name is used to generate unique metric labels, generating metrics like these:
```
service_requests_total{category="activity",family="eclipse-marketplace",service="eclipse_marketplace_update"} 2
service_requests_total{category="activity",family="npm",service="npm_collaborators"} 3
service_requests_total{category="activity",family="steam",service="steam_file_release_date"} 2
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="ansible",service="ansible_galaxy_content_quality_score"} 2
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="cii-best-practices",service="cii_best_practices_service"} 4
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="cocoapods",service="cocoapods_docs"} 2
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="codacy",service="codacy_grade"} 3
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="coverity",service="coverity_scan"} 2
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="coverity",service="deprecated_coverity_ondemand"} 2
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="dependabot",service="dependabot_semver_compatibility"} 3
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="lgtm",service="lgtm_alerts"} 2
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="lgtm",service="lgtm_grade"} 3
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="snyk",service="snyk_vulnerability_git_hub"} 4
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="snyk",service="snyk_vulnerability_npm"} 5
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="symfony",service="sensiolabs_i_redirector"} 1
service_requests_total{category="analysis",family="symfony",service="symfony_insight_grade"} 1
service_requests_total{category="build",family="appveyor",service="app_veyor_ci"} 3
service_requests_total{category="build",family="appveyor",service="app_veyor_tests"} 6
service_requests_total{category="build",family="azure-devops",service="azure_dev_ops_build"} 6
service_requests_total{category="build",family="azure-devops",service="azure_dev_ops_release"} 5
service_requests_total{category="build",family="azure-devops",service="azure_dev_ops_tests"} 6
service_requests_total{category="build",family="azure-devops",service="vso_build_redirector"} 2
service_requests_total{category="build",family="azure-devops",service="vso_release_redirector"} 1
service_requests_total{category="build",family="bitbucket",service="bitbucket_pipelines"} 5
service_requests_total{category="build",family="circleci",service="circle_ci"} 5
```
This is predicated on being able to use Prometheus's [`rate()`](https://prometheus.io/docs/prometheus/latest/querying/functions/#rate) function to visualize a counter's rate of change, as mentioned at https://github.com/badges/shields/issues/2068#issuecomment-466696561. Otherwise the stats will be disrupted every time a server restarts.
The metrics only appear on new-style services.
This will definitely save time, and ensure more uniformity.
It moves the `createServiceTester()` calls to a different place from where I'd like them, though I'm happy to have them checked by the linter.
Closes#2701
While Next.js can handle static sites, we've had a few issues with it, notably a performance hit at runtime and some bugginess around routing and SSR. Gatsby being fully intended for high-performance static sites makes it a great technical fit for the Shields frontend. The `createPages()` API should be a really nice way to add a page for each service family, for example.
This migrates the frontend from Next.js to Gatsby. Gatsby is a powerful tool, which has a bit of downside as there's a lot to dig through. Overall I found configuration easier than Next.js. There are a lot of plugins and for the most part they worked out of the box. The documentation is good.
Links are cleaner now: there is no #. This will break old links though perhaps we could add some redirection to help with that. The only one I’m really concerned about `/#/endpoint`. I’m not sure if folks are deep-linking to the category pages.
There are a lot of enhancements we could add, in order to speed up the site even more. In particular we could think about inlining the SVGs rather than making separate requests for each one.
While Gatsby recommends GraphQL, it's not required. To keep things simple and reduce the learning curve, I did not use it here.
Close#1943Fix#2837Fix#2616
The suggest code was an exception to our usual organization pattern. There was a service test, but it's not a service. The code would sometimes regress because it wasn't being tested all the time.
This makes them no longer run as service tests, which is good because they run as part of every build. Some of them are smaller-bracket tests which is good too, because it will make them easier to test, especially as this code grows.
I'd have liked to keep using frisby for the ones that make requests to the server, though I ran into some issues with sequencing of setup that I think will require upstream changes.
In #2698 we decided to put legacy helper functions in `core/legacy`. I think that’s a fine idea, though if we’re going to have a bunch of badge helper functions in there, it seems like it is probably better to keep these two important but esoteric helper functions with the core code to which they are most coupled. So I added `legacy-` to the name, and put them in `core/base-service`.
This test is being weirdly flaky in #2809. The problem seems to be in the test helper code, so I rewrote this using Joi.
I imagine the change has to do with a change to the test ordering. It's a bit puzzling.
However, the new test seems fine (and the endpoint is rarely used; not critical to begin with).
