This will definitely save time, and ensure more uniformity.
It moves the `createServiceTester()` calls to a different place from where I'd like them, though I'm happy to have them checked by the linter.
Closes#2701
While Next.js can handle static sites, we've had a few issues with it, notably a performance hit at runtime and some bugginess around routing and SSR. Gatsby being fully intended for high-performance static sites makes it a great technical fit for the Shields frontend. The `createPages()` API should be a really nice way to add a page for each service family, for example.
This migrates the frontend from Next.js to Gatsby. Gatsby is a powerful tool, which has a bit of downside as there's a lot to dig through. Overall I found configuration easier than Next.js. There are a lot of plugins and for the most part they worked out of the box. The documentation is good.
Links are cleaner now: there is no #. This will break old links though perhaps we could add some redirection to help with that. The only one I’m really concerned about `/#/endpoint`. I’m not sure if folks are deep-linking to the category pages.
There are a lot of enhancements we could add, in order to speed up the site even more. In particular we could think about inlining the SVGs rather than making separate requests for each one.
While Gatsby recommends GraphQL, it's not required. To keep things simple and reduce the learning curve, I did not use it here.
Close#1943Fix#2837Fix#2616
This test is being weirdly flaky in #2809. The problem seems to be in the test helper code, so I rewrote this using Joi.
I imagine the change has to do with a change to the test ordering. It's a bit puzzling.
However, the new test seems fine (and the endpoint is rarely used; not critical to begin with).
dependabot-preview[bot]andPaul Melnikow
Paul MelnikowandPierre-Yves B
