* migrate some services from examples to openApi
* fixup which --> variant param rename
* improve descriptions
* migrate gem version
* improve descriptions for ruby gems
* standardise on packageName for all conda badges
This moves a few helpers from `lib/` to `services/`:
build-status.js
build-status.spec.js
color-formatters.js
color-formatters.spec.js
contributor-count.js
licenses.js
licenses.spec.js
php-version.js
php-version.spec.js
text-formatters.js
text-formatters.spec.js
version.js
version.spec.js
And one from `lib/` to `core/`:
unhandled-rejection.spec.js
The diff is long, but the changes are straightforward.
Ref #2832
This will definitely save time, and ensure more uniformity.
It moves the `createServiceTester()` calls to a different place from where I'd like them, though I'm happy to have them checked by the linter.
Closes#2701
Fixes#2876 with @paulmelnikow's suggestion
Moved imports of `ServiceTester` and `createServiceTester` to a separate file so that dev dependencies are not imported by service classes.
Continue to implement #2698:
- Add `core/base-service/index.js` (but hold off on moving the things it imports)
- Add shortcuts in `services/index.js` for Base*Service, errors, and deprecatedService. This file will be streamlined later to avoid cluttering it with rarely used bits.
- Apply consistent ordering of imports and use of `module.exports` in testers.
- Remove some renaming of imports.
- Remove obsolete tests here and there.
Close#2334
To avoid merge conflicts, I've deferred removing the aliasing logic in `prepareExamples`. That whole function will be refactored momentarily, and there's also #2339 open.
The term “url” is overloaded in services, to refer to the Shields route and also the API URL. Calling the Shields URL a “route” is on the whole more descriptive, and makes it clearer and more obvious which one of these we’re talking about. It’s a small thing, though seems like an improvement.
We have a few functions called `buildUrl`. I’ve renamed them to `buildRoute` when they refer to routes, and left them as `buildUrl` when they refer to API URLs.
I included a minor style tweak and some formatting cleanup in `TUTORIAL.md`.
1. Add validation to BaseSvgScrapingService and update readthedocs accordingly.
2. Rewrite vso and add more tests. Rename it internally to azure-devops. URLs are still `/vso` for now. Should we make a way to let a service register multiple URL patterns?
3. Handle shared code using a functional pattern instead of inheritance. This comes from a discussion https://github.com/badges/shields/pull/2031#issuecomment-417893819. I like the functional approach because it's more direct, nimble, and easy to reason about; plus it allows services to grow from a family of one to two more easily.
Based on discussion in #2031, this adds an abstract service for SVG badges. I started with Readthedocs and the other services can be done as a follow-on.
I called it **BaseSvgScrapingService** rather than **BaseSvgService** to clarify that it's for badges from svg source data – not svg badges, which is all the badges.
Since I don't expect the svg parsing function to be used anywhere else once the services are refactored, I moved it into the class. I added a default value for `valueMatcher`, which works on Shields-style badges and seems to be used more than once.
The tests are based on XmlBaseService. I added one for valueMatcher, and also moved the SVG parsing badge here. Testing on codacy + vso should ensure the old `fetchFromSvg` is still working.
all-badge-examples is a common cause of merge conflicts. It’s difficult to adjust the badge categorization in that file – or to understand the diff – because it requires moving a block from one point to another. It’s much easier to edit a badge’s category in one place.
This starts the process of breaking up what’s left of that file, following up on the work from #1931. New-style services can only be in one category, which means legacy service examples have to be split along category lines. I split out separate legacy service classes where I could do so easily, leaving behind the ones which require more work, for one reason or another.
