Fix typos and clarify non-promotional (#2898)
Just noticed this typo and that one of the essential parts of the specification could be worded more clearly. It seems like the hardest to enforce with SaaS companies, so I don't think the explicitness will hurt.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ This document specifies the visual design of Shields badges.
|
||||
## Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- **legible**: it should be as easy to read the metadata provided by a badge as it is to read body copy inside of a README file regardless of display resolution
|
||||
- **semantic**: the purpose information provided by a badge should be self-evident
|
||||
- **non-promotional**: badges should not advertise but instead provide value through information
|
||||
- **semantic**: the purpose of the information provided by a badge should be self-evident
|
||||
- **non-promotional**: badges should refrain from advertising a service but instead provide value through the badge's information instead
|
||||
- **concise**: one descriptive word on the left (the key), one piece of data on the right (the value)
|
||||
- **hyperlinked**: badges can link to a third-party website providing more information, either related to the metadata provided by the badge or about the project the badge was used for (e.g. an open source library)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user