isc_task_pause/unpause were inherently thread-unsafe - a task
could be paused only once by one thread, if the task was running
while we paused it it led to races. Fix it by making sure that
the task will pause if requested to, and by using a 'pause reference
counter' to count task pause requests - a task will be unpaused
iff all threads unpause it.
Don't remove from queue when pausing task - we lock the queue lock
(expensive), while it's unlikely that the task will be running -
and we'll remove it anyway in dispatcher
Both clang-tidy and uncrustify chokes on statement like this:
for (...)
if (...)
break;
This commit uses a very simple semantic patch (below) to add braces around such
statements.
Semantic patch used:
@@
statement S;
expression E;
@@
while (...)
- if (E) S
+ { if (E) { S } }
@@
statement S;
expression E;
@@
for (...;...;...)
- if (E) S
+ { if (E) { S } }
@@
statement S;
expression E;
@@
if (...)
- if (E) S
+ { if (E) { S } }
There was a hard limit set on number of uvreq and nmhandles
that can be allocated by a pool, but we don't handle a situation
where we can't get an uvreq. Don't limit the number at all,
let the OS deal with it.
The memory ordering in the rwlock was all wrong, I am copying excerpts
from the https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/atomic/memory_order#Relaxed_ordering
for the convenience of the reader:
Relaxed ordering
Atomic operations tagged memory_order_relaxed are not synchronization
operations; they do not impose an order among concurrent memory
accesses. They only guarantee atomicity and modification order
consistency.
Release-Acquire ordering
If an atomic store in thread A is tagged memory_order_release and an
atomic load in thread B from the same variable is tagged
memory_order_acquire, all memory writes (non-atomic and relaxed atomic)
that happened-before the atomic store from the point of view of thread
A, become visible side-effects in thread B. That is, once the atomic
load is completed, thread B is guaranteed to see everything thread A
wrote to memory.
The synchronization is established only between the threads releasing
and acquiring the same atomic variable. Other threads can see different
order of memory accesses than either or both of the synchronized
threads.
Which basically means that we had no or weak synchronization between
threads using the same variables in the rwlock structure. There should
not be a significant performance drop because the critical sections were
already protected by:
while(1) {
if (relaxed_atomic_operation) {
break;
}
LOCK(lock);
if (!relaxed_atomic_operation) {
WAIT(sem, lock);
}
UNLOCK(lock)l
}
I would add one more thing to "Don't do your own crypto, folks.":
- Also don't do your own locking, folks.
Also disable the semantic patch as the code needs tweaks here and there because
some destroy functions might not destroy the object and return early if the
object is still in use.
Creation of EVP_MD_CTX and EVP_PKEY is quite expensive, until
we fix the code to reuse the context and key we'll use our own
implementation of siphash.
In system tests on Windows tool's local port can sometimes clash with
'named'. On Unix the system is poked for the minimal local port,
otherwise is set to 32768 as a sane minimum. For Windows we don't
poke but set a hardcoded limit; this change aligns the limit with
Unix and changes it to 32768.
389 else
CID 1452695 (#1 of 1): Dereference before null check (REVERSE_INULL)
check_after_deref: Null-checking lcfg suggests that it may
be null, but it has already been dereferenced on all paths
leading to the check.
390 if (lcfg != NULL)
391 isc_logconfig_destroy(&lcfg);
The isc_buffer_allocate() function now cannot fail with ISC_R_MEMORY.
This commit removes all the checks on the return code using the semantic
patch from previous commit, as isc_buffer_allocate() now returns void.
The isc_mempool_create() function now cannot fail with ISC_R_MEMORY.
This commit removes all the checks on the return code using the semantic
patch from previous commit, as isc_mempool_create() now returns void.
To reproduce the race - create a task, send two events to it, first one
must take some time. Then, from the outside, pause(), unpause() and detach()
the task.
When the long-running event is processed by the task it is in
task_state_running state. When we called pause() the state changed to
task_state_paused, on unpause we checked that there are events in the task
queue, changed the state to task_state_ready and enqueued the task on the
workers readyq. We then detach the task.
The dispatch() is done with processing the event, it processes the second
event in the queue, and then shuts down the task and frees it (as it's not
referenced anymore). Dispatcher then takes the, already freed, task from
the queue where it was wrongly put, causing an use-after free and,
subsequently, either an assertion failure or a segmentation fault.
The probability of this happening is very slim, yet it might happen under a
very high load, more probably on a recursive resolver than on an
authoritative.
The fix introduces a new 'task_state_pausing' state - to which tasks
are moved if they're being paused while still running. They are moved
to task_state_paused state when dispatcher is done with them, and
if we unpause a task in paused state it's moved back to task_state_running
and not requeued.
When two threads unreferenced handles coming from one socket while
the socket was being destructed we could get a use-after-free:
Having handle H1 coming from socket S1, H2 coming from socket S2,
S0 being a parent socket to S1 and S2:
Thread A Thread B
Unref handle H1 Unref handle H2
Remove H1 from S1 active handles Remove H2 from S2 active handles
nmsocket_maybe_destroy(S1) nmsocket_maybe_destroy(S2)
nmsocket_maybe_destroy(S0) nmsocket_maybe_destroy(S0)
LOCK(S0->lock)
Go through all children, figure
out that we have no more active
handles:
sum of S0->children[i]->ah == 0
UNLOCK(S0->lock)
destroy(S0)
LOCK(S0->lock)
- but S0 is already gone
We weren't consistent about who should unreference the handle in
case of network error. Make it consistent so that it's always the
client code responsibility to unreference the handle - either
in the callback or right away if send function failed and the callback
will never be called.
In tcp and udp stoplistening code we accessed libuv structures
from a different thread, which caused a shutdown crash when named
was under load. Also added additional DbC checks making sure we're
in a proper thread when accessing uv_ functions.
We had a race in which n UDP socket could have been already closing
by libuv but we still sent data to it. Mark socket as not-active
when stopping listening and verify that socket is not active when
trying to send data to it.
We pass interface as an opaque argument to tcpdns listening socket.
If we stop listening on an interface but still have in-flight connections
the opaque 'interface' is not properly reference counted, and we might
hit a dead memory. We put just a single source of truth in a listening
socket and make the child sockets use that instead of copying the
value from listening socket. We clean the callback when we stop listening.
- isc__netievent_storage_t was to small to contain
isc__netievent__socket_streaminfo_t on Windows
- handle isc_uv_export and isc_uv_import errors properly
- rewrite isc_uv_export and isc_uv_import on Windows
hp implementation requires an object for each thread accessing
a hazard pointer. previous implementation had a hardcoded
HP_MAX_THREAD value of 128, which failed on machines with lots of
CPU cores (named uses 3n threads). We make isc__hp_max_threads
configurable at startup, with the value set to 4*named_g_cpus.
It's also important for this value not to be too big as we do
linear searches on a list.
