The "max-zone-ttl" option should now be configured as part of
dnssec-policy. Use of this option in zone/view/options will be ignored
in any zone that also has dnssec-policy configured.
Since !6413 we discourage opt-out, so we should not be advertising it in
the examples. Even worse, it was just thrown into the command line
without even mentioning its meaning in the surrounding text.
Related: !6413
(cherry picked from commit beae857288)
Add "internal" to the list of legal values for the -M command-line
option (commit 1f7d2d53f0 added that
flag).
Make the style of the relevant paragraph more in line with the next one
and split its contents up into an unordered list of options for improved
readability.
(cherry picked from commit f0c31ceb3b)
The two procedures were essentially the same, but each instance was
missing some details from the other. They are now combined into one text
in the DNSSEC Guide and linked from DNSSEC chapter.
(cherry picked from commit 7d25027898)
Mostly deduplicating and linking information across the ARM.
Generally people should not touch it unless they what they are doing, so
let's try to discourage them a bit.
(cherry picked from commit bffa3063f0)
This is essentially a backport of !6296.
Replace DNSSEC chapter with version from the main branch, commit
901b6425d2.
There were structural changes to the ARM in the main branch, and
replacing the whole file with a new version is an order of magniture
easier than attempting to cherry-pick individual changes which should, in
the end, produce the same file under a different name.
File names in the main branch and v9_16 are now in sync (for the DNSSEC
chapter).
Fixes: #3320
Make clear that inline-signing stores DNSSEC records in a signed
version of the zone, using the zone's filename plus ".signed" extension.
Tell that dynamic zones store updates in the zone's filename.
DNSSEC records for dynamic zones also go in the zone's filename, unless
inline-signing is enabled.
Then, dnssec-policy assumes inline-signing, but only if the zone is
not dynamic.
(cherry picked from commit 8860f6b4ff)
Based on measurements done on BIND v9_19_2 using bank. TLD and a
synthetitc fullly signed zone, using RSASHA256 and ECDSAP256SHA256
algorithms with NSEC and NSEC3 without opt-out.
(cherry picked from commit 635885afe6)
This section was completely out of date. Current measurements on dataset
Telco EU 2022-02 and BIND 9.19.1 indicate absolutely different results
than described in the old version of the text.
(cherry picked from commit 6cf8066b9c)
Guide in this repo is tied to latest version anyway, so let's not even
mention ancient versions of BIND.
This also solves the OpenSSL question because it is now mandatory for
build, which subsequently removes the entropy problem - so let's not
mention it either.
(cherry picked from commit 6e79877759)
