This commit adds a lengthy test where the ZSK is rolled but the
KSK is offline (except for when the DNSKEY RRset is changed). The
specific scenario has the `dnskey-kskonly` configuration option set
meaning the DNSKEY RRset should only be signed with the KSK.
A new zone `updatecheck-kskonly.secure` is added to test against,
that can be dynamically updated, and that can be controlled with rndc
to load the DNSSEC keys.
There are some pre-checks for this test to make sure everything is
fine before the ZSK roll, after the new ZSK is published, and after
the old ZSK is deleted. Note there are actually two ZSK rolls in
quick succession.
When the latest added ZSK becomes active and its predecessor becomes
inactive, the KSK is offline. However, the DNSKEY RRset did not
change and it has a good signature that is valid for long enough.
The expected behavior is that the DNSKEY RRset stays signed with
the KSK only (signature does not need to change). However, the
test will fail because after reconfiguring the keys for the zone,
it wants to add re-sign tasks for the new active keys (in sign_apex).
Because the KSK is offline, named determines that the only other
active key, the latest ZSK, will be used to resign the DNSKEY RRset,
in addition to keeping the RRSIG of the KSK.
The question is: Why do we need to resign the DNSKEY RRset
immediately when a new key becomes active? This is not required,
only once the next resign task is triggered the new active key
should replace signatures that are in need of refreshing.
Simply looking for the key ID surrounded by spaces in the tested
dnssec-signzone output file is not a precise enough method of checking
for signatures prepared using a given key ID: it can be tripped up by
cross-algorithm key ID collisions and certain low key IDs (e.g. 60, the
TTL specified in bin/tests/system/dnssec/signer/example.db.in), which
triggers false positives for the "dnssec" system test. Make key ID
extraction precise by using an awk script which operates on specific
fields.
More specifically: ignore configured trusted and managed keys that
match a disabled algorithm. The behavioral change is that
associated responses no longer SERVFAIL, but return insecure.
For checks querying a named instance with "dnssec-accept-expired yes;"
set, authoritative responses have a TTL of 300 seconds. Assuming empty
resolver cache, TTLs of RRsets in the ANSWER section of the first
response to a given query will always match their authoritative
counterparts. Also note that for a DNSSEC-validating named resolver,
validated RRsets replace any existing non-validated RRsets with the same
owner name and type, e.g. cached from responses received while resolving
CD=1 queries. Since TTL capping happens before a validated RRset is
inserted into the cache and RRSIG expiry time does not impose an upper
TTL bound when "dnssec-accept-expired yes;" is set and, as pointed out
above, the original TTLs of the relevant RRsets equal 300 seconds, the
RRsets in the ANSWER section of the responses to expiring.example/SOA
and expired.example/SOA queries sent with CD=0 should always be exactly
120 seconds, never a lower value. Make the relevant TTL checks stricter
to reflect that.
Always expecting a TTL of exactly 300 seconds for RRsets found in the
ADDITIONAL section of responses received for CD=1 queries sent during
TTL capping checks is too strict since these responses will contain
records cached from multiple DNS messages received during the resolution
process.
In responses to queries sent with CD=1, ns.expiring.example/A in the
ADDITIONAL section will come from a delegation returned by ns2 while the
ANSWER section will come from an authoritative answer returned by ns3.
If the queries to ns2 and ns3 happen at different Unix timestamps,
RRsets cached from the older response will have a different TTL by the
time they are returned to dig, triggering a false positive.
Allow a safety margin of 60 seconds for checks inspecting the ADDITIONAL
section of responses to queries sent with CD=1 to fix the issue. A
safety margin this large is likely overkill, but it is used nevertheless
for consistency with similar safety margins used in other TTL capping
checks.
Commit c032c54dda inadvertently changed
the DNS message section inspected by one of the TTL capping checks from
ADDITIONAL to ANSWER, introducing a discrepancy between that check's
description and its actual meaning. Revert to inspecting the ADDITIONAL
section in the aforementioned check.
Changes introduced by commit 6b8e4d6e69
were incomplete as not all time-sensitive checks were updated to match
revised "nta-lifetime" and "nta-recheck" values. Prevent rare false
positives by updating all NTA-related checks so that they work reliably
with "nta-lifetime 12s;" and "nta-recheck 9s;". Update comments as well
to prevent confusion.
- the checkprivate function in the dnssec test set ret=0, erasing
results from previous tests and making the test appear to have passed
when it shouldn't have
- checkprivate needed a delay loop to ensure there was time for all
private signing records to be updated before the test
Tell the user explicitly about their mistakes:
* Unknown options, e.g. -list instead of -dump
or -delete instead of -remove.
* Unknown view names.
* Excess arguments.
Include the view name in `rndc nta -dump` output, for consistency with
the NTA add and remove actions.
When removing an NTA from all views, do not abort with an error if the
NTA was not found in one of the views.
- added tests to the dnssec system test that duplicate the ones
from bin/tests/dnssec-signzone
- changed cleanall.sh so it doesn't automatically remove all
key files, because there are now some of those that are part of the
distribution
- removed a few remaing places where output wasn't being passed
through echo_i or cat_i
- added a "digcomp" function to conf.sh.in to send digcomp.pl output
through cat_i and return the correct exit value
- set SYSTESTDIR when calling echo_i from nsX directories, so that
the test name will always be printed correctly
- fixed a test name typo in conf.sh.in
- add CHANGES note
- update copyrights and license headers
- add -j to the make commands in .gitlab-ci.yml to take
advantage of parallelization in the gitlab CI process
