ensure rpz summary consistence during AXFR updates
4121. [bug] When updating a response-policy zone via AXFR, summary data about other policy zones could fall out of sync. Ultimately this could trigger an assertion failure in rpz.c. [RT #39567] (cherry picked from commit19365b43e9) (cherry picked from commit433b64a548)
This commit is contained in:
+30
-16
@@ -315,23 +315,37 @@
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
A bug in the RPZ implementation could cause some policy
|
||||
zones that did not specifically require recursion to be
|
||||
treated as if they did; consequently, setting
|
||||
<command>qname-wait-recurse no;</command> was
|
||||
sometimes ineffective. This has been corrected.
|
||||
In most configurations, behavioral changes due to this
|
||||
fix will not be noticeable. [RT #39229]
|
||||
Several bugs have been fixed in the RPZ implementation:
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
A bug in RPZ could cause the server to crash if policy
|
||||
zones were updated (e.g. via <command>rndc reload</command>
|
||||
or an incoming zone transfer) while RPZ processing was still
|
||||
ongoing for an active query. [RT #39415]
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Policy zones that did not specifically require recursion
|
||||
could be treated as if they did; consequently, setting
|
||||
<command>qname-wait-recurse no;</command> was
|
||||
sometimes ineffective. This has been corrected.
|
||||
In most configurations, behavioral changes due to this
|
||||
fix will not be noticeable. [RT #39229]
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The server could crash if policy zones were updated (e.g.
|
||||
via <command>rndc reload</command> or an incoming zone
|
||||
transfer) while RPZ processing was still ongoing for an
|
||||
active query. [RT #39415]
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
On servers with more than one policy zone configured,
|
||||
if one policy zone was updated via AXFR (especially when
|
||||
the zone was very large) a race condition could allow the
|
||||
RPZ summary data to fall out of sync with the policy zones,
|
||||
potentially leading to an assertion failure in rpz.c.
|
||||
[RT #39567]
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
</sect2>
|
||||
<sect2 id="end_of_life">
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user