From 648807b4f558f0ccc674c609be1439b8787ee6d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Tatuya=20JINMEI=20=E7=A5=9E=E6=98=8E=E9=81=94=E5=93=89?= Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 07:10:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] regen --- configure | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure b/configure index b9272d04cf..422da444c0 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ # OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR # PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. # -# $Id: configure,v 1.369 2005/07/08 04:36:29 marka Exp $ +# $Id: configure,v 1.370 2005/07/09 07:10:22 jinmei Exp $ # # Portions Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Nominum, Inc. # @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ # WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN # ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT # OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. -# From configure.in Revision: 1.382 . +# From configure.in Revision: 1.383 . # Guess values for system-dependent variables and create Makefiles. # Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.59. # @@ -27463,7 +27463,7 @@ if test "$use_atomic" = "yes"; then echo $ECHO_N "checking architecture type for atomic operations... $ECHO_C" >&6 case "$host" in i[3456]86-*|x86_64-*) - # XXX: some old x86 architectures actualy do not support + # XXX: some old x86 architectures actually do not support # (some of) these operations. Do we need stricter checks? # Note: We currently use the same code for both the x86_32 and # x86_64 architectures, but there may be a better @@ -27479,6 +27479,10 @@ echo $ECHO_N "checking architecture type for atomic operations... $ECHO_C" >&6 have_atomic=yes arch=powerpc ;; + mips-*) + have_atomic=yes + arch=mips + ;; *) have_atomic=no arch=noatomic