fixed comment about support for splitting of bitstring labels
This commit is contained in:
@@ -70,10 +70,9 @@ marginally); the nodes at d.e.f and w.y do not represent keys.
|
||||
As an aside, remember that when ordering DNS names, labels are
|
||||
examined from the right, therefore w.y sorts after x and before z.
|
||||
|
||||
When bitfields are fully supported (they aren't yet) then a split can
|
||||
occur not only on a regular label boundary, but also between any two
|
||||
bits. The common-suffix rules will be applied to keep as many bits
|
||||
together as possible.
|
||||
A split can occur not only on a regular label boundary, but also
|
||||
between any two bits in an EDNS bitstring label. The common-suffix
|
||||
rules will be applied to keep as many bits together as possible.
|
||||
|
||||
In the current implementation of the tree of trees, a node is
|
||||
considered to "formally" exist only if it has data associated with
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user