


Frequently Asked Questions about BIND 9


Q: Why doesn't -u work on Linux 2.2.x when I build with --enable-threads?

A: Linux threads do not fully implement the Posix threads (pthreads) standard.
In particular, setuid() operates only on the current thread, not the full
process.  Because of this limitation, BIND 9 cannot use setuid() on Linux as it
can on all other supported platforms.  setuid() cannot be called before
creating threads, since the server does not start listening on reserved ports
until after threads have started.

  In the 2.2.18 or 2.3.99-pre3 and newer kernels, the ability to preserve
capabilities across a setuid() call is present.  This allows BIND 9 to call
setuid() early, while retaining the ability to bind reserved ports.  This is
a Linux-specific hack.

  On a 2.2 kernel, BIND 9 does drop many root privileges, so it should be less
of a security risk than a root process that has not dropped privileges.

  If Linux threads ever work correctly, this restriction will go away.

  Configuring BIND9 with the --disable-threads option (the default) causes a
non-threaded version to be built, which will allow -u to be used.


Q: Why does named log the warning message "no TTL specified - using SOA
MINTTL instead"?

A: Your zone file is illegal according to RFC1035.  It must either
have a line like

   $TTL 86400

at the beginning, or the first record in it must have a TTL field,
like the "84600" in this example:

   example.com. 86400 IN SOA ns hostmaster ( 1 3600 1800 1814400 3600 )

Q: Why do I see 5 (or more) copies of named on Linux?

A: Linux threads each show up as a process under ps.  The approximate
number of threads running is n+4, where n is the number of CPUs.  Note that
the amount of memory used is not cumulative; if each process is using 10M of
memory, only a total of 10M is used.


Q: Why does BIND 9 log "permission denied" errors accessing its
configuration files or zones on my Linux system even though it is running
as root?

A: On Linux, BIND 9 drops most of its root privileges on startup.
This including the privilege to open files owned by other users.
Therefore, if the server is running as root, the configuration files
and zone files should also be owned by root.


Q: Why do I get errors like "dns_zone_load: zone foo/IN: loading master file
bar: ran out of space"

A: This is often caused by TXT records with missing close quotes.  Check that
all TXT records containing quoted strings have both open and close quotes.


Q: How do I produce a usable core file from a multithreaded named
on Linux?

A: Apply the kernel patch found in contrib/linux/coredump-patch and rebuild
the kernel.  This patch causes multithreaded programs to dump the correct
thread.


Q: How do I restrict people from looking up the server version?

A: Put a "version" option containing something other than the real
version in the "options" section of named.conf.  Note doing this will
not prevent attacks and may impede people trying to diagnose problems
with your server.  Also it is possible to "fingerprint" nameservers to
determine their version.


Q: How do I restrict only remote users from looking up the server
version?

A: The following view statement will intercept lookups as the internal
view that holds the version information will be matched last.  The
caveats of the previous answer still apply, of course.

  view "chaos" chaos {
	  match-clients { <those to be refused>; };
	  allow-query { none; };
	  zone "." {
		  type hint;
		  file "/dev/null";  // or any empty file
	  };
  };


Q: What do "no source of entropy found" or "could not open entropy source foo"
mean?

A: The server requires a source of entropy to perform certain operations,
mostly DNSSEC related.  These messages indicate that you have no source
of entropy.  On systems with /dev/random or an equivalent, it is used by
default.  A source of entropy can also be defined using the random-device
option in named.conf.


Q: I installed BIND 9 and restarted named, but it's still BIND 8.  Why?

A: BIND 9 is installed under /usr/local by default.  BIND 8 is often
installed under /usr.  Check that the correct named is running.


Q: I'm trying to use TSIG to authenticate dynamic updates or zone
transfers.  I'm sure I have the keys set up correctly, but the server
is rejecting the TSIG.  Why?

A: This may be a clock skew problem.  Check that the the clocks on
the client and server are properly synchronized (e.g., using ntp).


Q: I'm trying to compile BIND 9, and "make" is failing due to files not
being found.  Why?

A: Using a parallel or distributed "make" to build BIND 9 is not
supported, and doesn't work.  If you are using one of these, use
normal make or gmake instead.


Q: I have a BIND 9 master and a BIND 8.2.3 slave, and the master is
logging error messages like "notify to 10.0.0.1#53 failed: unexpected
end of input".  What's wrong?

A: This error message is caused by a known bug in BIND 8.2.3 and will
be fixed in 8.2.4.  It can be safely ignored - the notify has been
acted on by the slave despite the error message.


Q: I keep getting log messages like the following.  Why?

   Jun 21 12:00:00.000 client 10.0.0.1#1234: update denied

Someone is trying to update your DNS data using the RFC2136 Dynamic
Update protocol.  Windows 2000 machines have a habit of sending dynamic
update requests to DNS servers without being specifically configured to
do so.  If the update requests are coming from a Windows 2000 machine,
see <http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q246/8/04.asp>
for information about how to turn them off.


Q: I see a log message like the following.  Why?

   couldn't open pid file '/var/run/named.pid': Permission denied

You are most likely running named as a non-root user, and that user
does not have permission to write in /var/run.  The common ways of
fixing this are to create a /var/run/named directory owned by the named
user and set pid-file to "/var/run/named/named.pid", or set
pid-file to "named.pid", which will put the file in the directory
specified by the directory option (which, in this case, must be writable
by the named user).


Q: When I do a "dig . ns", many of the A records for the root
servers are missing.  Why?

A: This is normal and harmless.  It is a somewhat confusing side effect
of the way BIND 9 does RFC2181 trust ranking and of the efforts BIND 9
makes to avoid promoting glue into answers.

When BIND 9 first starts up and primes its cache, it receives the root
server addresses as additional data in an authoritative response from
a root server, and these records are eligible for inclusion as
additional data in responses.  Subsequently it receives a subset of
the root server addresses as additional data in a non-authoritative
(referral) response from a root server.  This causes the addresses to
now be considered non-authoritative (glue) data, which is not eligible
for inclusion in responses.

The server does have a complete set of root server addresses cached
at all times, it just may not include all of them as additional data,
depending on whether they were last received as answers or as glue.
You can always look up the addresses with explicit queries like
"dig a.root-servers.net A".

